To: Dr. Sivana
And 10% may not be majority, but when the Mara's cannot agree, it will be the tie-breaker ... I assumed the "non-controlling share" angle to this means the Koch owners will have no say in the organization's management and operations.
24 posted on
09/04/2025 12:54:07 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Although my eyes were open, they might just as well be closed.")
To: Alberta's Child
I assumed the "non-controlling share" angle to this means the Koch owners will have no say in the organization's management and operations.
You are correct. I had thought that it was "non-controlling" because it wasn't a majority. Well, it is still a decent financial bet. Makes me wonder why Rush Limbaugh wasn't allowed to buy part of the St. Louis Rams when that was being talked about.
28 posted on
09/04/2025 2:36:49 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson