Posted on 08/29/2025 3:16:05 AM PDT by fwdude
There’s a reason you can’t go to a gay bar without someone asking for your sign or why your lesbian friend keeps offering to give you a tarot card reading. Queer adults are more likely to consult astrology or horoscopes, and they’re also more likely to believe in them.
Over half of LGBTQ+ Americans (54 percent) consult astrology or horoscopes at least yearly, according to a May survey from the Pew Research Center. This is nearly twice the percentage of the general U.S. adult population (28 percent). Another 33 percent of LGBTQ+ adults said they consult tarot cards, three times as much as U.S. adults overall (11 percent).
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
And in other news water is wet& fire is hot😜. So who gives a fart in a hurricane???
Big Perversion and they care for their “religion” of stars.
The more Godless our society gets, the more homosexuals come climbing out of the woodwork. As we wax worse and worse, we get worse and worse, like the trans epidemic taking place. What comes after that...?
Discovered that most didn't correctly count the days of someone born on a leap year but before the leap day.
It showed my wife's and myself were one day apart in our cycles.
We are coming up on our 50th wedding anniversary.
I remember the biorhythm craze. I thought it was silly, but the phrase “whatever floats your boat” has certainly been take seriously among the “flamboyant” community.
“The idea that star charts thousands of years out of date could predict the future is laughable in the extreme.”
Excellent point.
At the end of the day anyone who takes astrology seriously would need to become a Flat Earther to be internally consistent.
(The Flat Earther types believe the stars are not many light years away but are “close” and “under the dome”.)
They've already hinted at what's next numerous times, and when they consolidate enough power, they'll do it.
"Tax the churches."
Shut down churches which are not "gay affirming."
Criminally prosecuted leaders of churches implicated in inflaming "hate crime" sentiments in tangentially affiliated actors.
Impose social and civil penalties on people who are not willing to consider "transgender" people as possible dating material. (Yes, they've voiced this.)
Take children away from their natural parents who are not "gay affirming" enough.
I would add to your list “speech codes” where they get to decide what is acceptable speech and what is “hate speech”—with criminal codes and other varieties of cancelling for “hate speech”.
That would include trying to ban publication of any “hate speech” in any form and would include Internet censorship.
All the counsel you have received has only worn you out!
Let your astrologers come forward,
those stargazers who make predictions month by month,
let them save you from what is coming upon you.
Isaiah 47:13
All that’s been done already.
Try posting “faggot” almost anywhere on the internet and watch the cyber police descend on you and your online existence snuffed out.
When people reject the truth, they will believe anything.
What remains are implementation of proposals like making “deadnaming” illegal.
Democrats have proposed this stuff from time to time.
It's false not-quite-a-religion. Because a real religion -- even a very evil one -- demands some sort of moral seriousness.
I always ask them, “if your name is dead, then who murdered it?”
Satanism may lack moral seriousness—but it probably qualifies as a “religion”.
In fact that may be their religion.
Me, too!
It was one of my first computer programs, ever: Written in BASIC, on about 30-40 punchcards.
It was at that point (in 9th grade) that I realized that the alleged "cycles" probably wouldn't be exact. For instance, if the 23-day physical cycle weren't exactly 23 days long, but actually, say, 23.01 days long, the change would compound over time. Same for the 28-day emotional cycle, and the 33-day intellectual cycle - the slightest deviation would result in a major shift within just a few years.
After all, e.g., menstrual cycles aren't all that regular, either.
Regards,
Like Nancy Reagan and Jeane Dixon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.