Weird how they expect a machine to figure out all this when they themselves are living with the kid and didn’t have the sense to know that when their kid is spending more time in conversation with a computer than he is with them, they should intervene.
Seems to me they are probably in denial of what possible role they played in his life that he would make the fatal decision, or just as likely, what were they failing to do that could have prevented him from seeing value in his life? If you don’t fill a kid’s life with hope and teach him wisdom and faith and other life lessons, but let the world fill him instead, don’t blame that on a machine.
That’s all along the lines of what I was thinking. +1
I agree. The family needs to acknowledge its role in his time using this computer program and not being involved in real life with real people.