“Nope. I prefer an actual conservative approach.“
________________
Well, I guess you’re going to have to find one who can win an election. So far, we have none available, eh.
By the way, why don’t you go ahead and describe exactly what the “conservative approach” would look like. And explain how these chip makers would be inclined to bring their manufacturing to the USA under that approach?
Remember, a “conservative approach” wouldn’t use any taxpayer monies.
Just because nobody worth a crap runs doesn’t mean bad ideas are suddenly good. The government taking a stake in ANY company is a bad idea. When that company is on the way down it’s worse.
The conservative approach is leave it alone. Let companies succeed and fail on their own merit. And understand that failure provides opportunities. If Intel went under that would create a market opportunity. Factories in America would be available for cheap, and market would be available for up and coming companies. Protecting failing companies stifles competition and eliminates opportunities.