These people have seen anecdotal evidence and beyond. The President, the Director of the CIA, the Director of National Intelligence.
I realize this is a shock to our worldview. But it is what it is.
Is this not massive? I do not draw any conclusions as to what it is. But, as they say, this is something. It is not loony. It is out of our usual pattern of thinking. But it is what it is.
Read your comment again and read it carefully.
There is anecdotal and military sensory equipment evidence of "unidentified" craft (radar, FLIR on aircraft and ships). This evidence has been presented in open Congressional hearings and in SCIFs.
Top Gun pilots and shipboard intel officers.
"Unidentified" means "inconclusive."
I realize this is an ontological shock. That's the point.
No one has stated that they know what it is. That is the point.
The point is "uncertainty." But denial of uncertainty isn't logical.
You may not know it, but missile launch officers stationed underground at Malmstrom AFB (Montana in March 1967) and Minot AFB (North Dakota in September 1966) witnessed or were involved in an incident where UFOs tampered with nuclear weapons.
They testified before Congress about this.
I am not saying I know what this is. But it is something.
Denial isn't a logical approach to this.
Nobody is claiming their origin. All that's being argued here is the fact that they have been observed. That's indisputable...