We need to use this as a weapon.
This will pick off liberals in any country.
This is every liberal.
I've noticed this, in that my scientific findings on my property are contrary to many widely held beliefs among ecologists. Yet Grok went right along with me, hence making me suspicious of it. I expected it to challenge me, hoping for a bit of debate from which it could learn. I was disappointed there, as subsequent sessions showed no sign of recalling what had been discussed.
What use is AI that cannot learn?
I have used Grok in several different ways. Yesterday I asked Grok if it was supplying answers to please me. well of course it answered no—but I told Grok that I pegged it as a superlibrary with information being collated into a way that made sense—it liked that comparison
I’m a well-adjusted kind of guy - the voices in my head don’t feel threatened at all.
Right from the crazies that build the AI ,LOL
We had that long before AI came along. We had NPRMSNBCCNNABCCBSBBC, tiktok and reddit.
Don’t seek confirmation in the created (i.e. AI). Seek confirmation from the Creator. An argument could be made that AI is just the latest version of an alternative for personal validation to avoid having to address The One Who’s opinion is ultimately the one that matters.
I suspect that AI can be like an imaginary voice in the head of a person, which unknown to them is reinforcing their own delusions by telling them things they think they want to hear. Humans are very social creatures, whose view of the world is very much shaped by those around them. But AI isn’t a real person, just an algorithm which learns and adapts in a similar way to one.
Maybe he is in an AI Matrix and doesn’t know it.
Thank you...
They’re advertising these AI companion girlfriends and boyfriends. Imagine where that’s going to land people.
I also believe that the primary driving factor behind this effort, for leftists, is the realization that once they make everyone dependent upon AI it will become the most effective tool ever devised for deceiving every person on the planet. All it would take is subtle, undetectable manipulation of the AI algorithms to ensure the desired bias. We can already see a blatant leftist bias in the current models, but I suspect the developers will come up with some kind of “oversight” group and/or mechanism that they will claim is created to prevent such bias. Once that misdirection pacifies enough of the doubters, then the real manipulation can begin.
GIGO. Programmed with the bias of its creators.
Yet political psychosis e.g. being a democrat is considered ‘normal’.
Like in most things, the vice of capitalism is that it gives the people what they think they want.
[[Mental health experts are continuing to sound alarm bells about users of AI chatbots spiraling into severe mental health crises characterized by paranoia and delusions, a trend they’ve started to refer to as “AI psychosis.”]]
HUH? Sheesh- are people that mentally unstable? oh nm- I guess a lot would, as it seems a lot of people (Like Rosie O’donnell) fall into retarded conspiracy theories which i liken to a form of psychosis as they become totally disconnected with reality
Psychiatrists now face a brutal choice. Keep their patients drugged up, or risk losing them to drug-free AI.
I can’t stand the sycophancy of the base model of ChatGPT. There are other personalities available, and I’ve been hugely productive ever since I changed the personality to snarky, sarcastic, and highly-critical. It’s like working with my human colleagues but much more honest and transparent.