Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2025 9:36:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Right. Then stop buying them...


2 posted on 08/11/2025 9:37:02 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Pot meets kettle...................


3 posted on 08/11/2025 9:39:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Good


4 posted on 08/11/2025 9:42:57 AM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Sour grapes LOL


5 posted on 08/11/2025 9:45:43 AM PDT by Doctor Congo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Bkmk


7 posted on 08/11/2025 11:50:27 AM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

China hates it when we do to them like they do to us.


8 posted on 08/11/2025 12:07:53 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The only downside with all of these is that it highly encouraged China to invest heavily into its domestic chip and other tech-focused innovation and manufacturing. While the native Chinese technology is currently a generation behind leading Western chips, they are still (1) capable enough and (2) continue to advance.

It is like the difference between an F/A-18 E/F SuperHornet and an F/A-18 C/D Hornet. The SuperHornet is a more capable and more modern aircraft in terms of avionics technology than the legacy Hornet, but that is not to say that the legacy Hornet is ‘useless.’

Additionally, China is still receiving the latest chip technology through the black market/hidden purchases, just not in the numbers they need.

TL/DR version: I am not sure what better approach exists, but sometimes limiting the access to technology for a NEAR-PEER country only serves to advance that country’s domestic capabilities. Sure, it hits them hard in the near-term (eg how Huawei was hit hard for a time), but it eventually finds a workaround that is basic at first but becomes more sophisticated with passing time.


9 posted on 08/12/2025 2:21:21 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson