He doesn’t impress me as knowing what he’s writing about. The article is just a rant.
I think this article is spot on.
FTA: “I will proffer a harsh truth to you: the best outcome in Ukraine would be for Russia to win the war as expeditiously as possible, neutralize and disarm the place, change-out its illegitimate government, and let it revert to being the frontier backwater it was for eight decades previous, when it was not a problem for the other nations of the region.“
The article paragraph above illustrates your point about the author perfectly, IMO. Kuntsler writes as a true believer in the NYTimes tripe by Walter Duranty denying the famine that occurred under the Soviets. It seems certain the Ukrainian people have long and vivid memories on the Russian bear on how they would likely fare if Kuntsler’s vision became reality.
“He doesn’t impress me as knowing what he’s writing about. The article is just a rant.”
He does impress me as knowing what he’s writing about. The article is very logical.
Now, illuminate all of us. Where did he jump the tracks? Just one citation would be good.
“ He doesn’t impress me as knowing what he’s writing about. The article is just a rant.”
Sure. Or, the people about to be prosecuted for their parts in High Treason AND those about to be exposed for pedophelia and worse, are in positions to turn this simmering WWIII into the smoldering sun.
Au contraire, this is one of Kunstler’s best. The history of what happened in Ukraine hits the bullseye.
could you write better??? or are you just ranting