Posted on 07/31/2025 9:00:34 PM PDT by ransomnote
Amen. I think it started with banning the Marlboro Man. Rush was right to call them Feminazis. It started that long ago.
WOW
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/another-trans-person-arrested-for
Only source I’ve found.
Questionable although Andy Ngo is pretty reliable.
Doppler effect?
A sacrifice is ALWAYS required to get into The Club. Someone has to “die” an unnatural death.
Probably a doppler effect kind of thing like those X-ray guns that see through walls. If it's moving you can see it. So just sitting on a couch may not represent anything more than a blob.
It the filler and chemicals in the store bought cigs that have ALWAYS been the issue with cancer. Roll your own.
And in many cases, know who does your curing.
Even Indian Tobacco is under the microscope with regulators.
Horrifying.
And a dem response to this event - typical. And she makes an extremely cruel remark about Joey Jones physical condition (loss of his legs)
https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/08/29/jessica-tarlov-joey-jones-gun-control-debate-n2418121
Looks like a reputable citizen.
This crap is gonna escalate now that Gabbard dropped the bomb as posted by bitt above...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_5SFSlxBSQ
Obama News LIVE: Tulsi Gabbard EXPOSES Obama, Reveals Details Of His ‘Coup’ Plot Against Trump
It’s on a loop.
Keep your head on a swivel. See something, say something. Inform friends/family likewise.
It will be the rural schools, church schools and the private schools; softer and safer targets.
Any arm of a ‘traditional’ institution is in the threat zone.
My daughter is the principal of a church school.
I’ll talk to her today.
I didn’t use the precise years that Q suggested in his post ( used 1970, 1990, 2000), and asked about WW2 only. A noticeable shift occurred. This is pretty long, even I only skimmed.
Overview of WWII Historiography Evolution
The historiography of World War II has undergone significant transformations over the decades, shaped by newly available sources, shifting societal values, geopolitical changes, and evolving academic focuses. In the 1970s, narratives often emphasized military strategies, national heroism, and Western perspectives, relying heavily on available German records. By the 1990s, the end of the Cold War opened Soviet archives, leading to more balanced views on the Eastern Front and greater attention to social aspects like civilian experiences and moral complexities. In the 2020s, global, comparative, and inclusive approaches dominate, incorporating diverse voices, memory studies, and critiques of earlier narratives. These shifts are evident in both general history books and school textbooks, with a growing emphasis on personal stories, atrocities, and underrepresented groups.
Narratives in 1970s History Books
History books from around 1970, including influential works like A.J.P. Taylor’s The Origins of the Second World War (1961, but widely discussed in the 1970s), adopted Revisionist perspectives that portrayed WWII as an “ordinary” conflict rather than one driven solely by Hitler’s premeditated aggression.  This challenged the earlier Orthodox view, which stressed fascist ideology and criminal conspiracy (e.g., Hugh Trevor-Roper’s analyses). Themes centered on the destabilizing Treaty of Versailles, opportunistic leadership, and national unity, with occupied countries’ histories glorifying resistance movements to foster post-war strength.  Military history dominated, particularly from a Western lens, with limited coverage of the Eastern Front due to Soviet secrecy—relying instead on self-serving German sources that depicted the Wehrmacht as competent but undermined by Hitler. 
In U.S. high school textbooks from this era, depictions of American involvement in WWII were often impersonal and strategic, focusing on battles, alliances, and heroic liberation with less emphasis on individual suffering or atrocities.  For instance, the Holocaust received mention but not deep exploration, and women’s roles (e.g., in factories or as nurses) were minimally addressed, reflecting limited gender integration in narratives.  Overall, books portrayed the war as a “good war” for the Allies, with positive, unifying tones and fewer critiques of Allied actions like strategic bombing.
Narratives in 1990s History Books
By 1990, Post-Revisionist syntheses emerged, blending Orthodox and Revisionist ideas—such as Alan Bullock’s view of Hitler as both a strategist and opportunist.  The Historikerstreit (historians’ dispute) in 1980s Germany influenced 1990s works, debating the Holocaust’s uniqueness versus comparisons to Soviet crimes, with figures like Ernst Nolte pushing for normalization of the Nazi past.  Themes expanded to social histories, including women’s home-front roles, collaboration in occupied nations (e.g., Vichy France), and civilian conditions.  National narratives still emphasized heroic liberation but faced challenges, as in Denmark where revisionism highlighted establishment collaboration for political leverage. 
The 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall was pivotal, granting access to Soviet archives and enabling books like those by David Glantz and Richard Overy to reveal Stalin’s regime’s brutality and Soviet military reforms, correcting German-biased Eastern Front accounts.  In U.S. textbooks, coverage shifted toward personal experiences: by the 1990s, impersonal military descriptions decreased, while soldier testimonies, human costs, and atrocities like the Holocaust gained prominence.  Gender inclusion grew modestly, with more on women’s contributions, though still secondary to male-centered stories.  Critiques of U.S. actions, such as internment camps or bombing campaigns, began appearing, reflecting post-Vietnam skepticism.
Narratives in 2020s History Books
Around 2020, historiography adopted global and comparative lenses, as in Norman Davies’ Europe at War 1939–1945 (2006, influential into the 2020s), which stressed the Eastern European theater and moral ambiguities of allying with Stalin.  Themes include reevaluating war conduct (e.g., air-sea power’s decisiveness per Phillips Payson O’Brien), memory construction, commemorations, and roles of civilians, forced laborers, and POWs.  There’s heightened focus on Wehrmacht war crimes (beyond just the SS), Holocaust denial as pseudohistory, and inclusive topics like race, gender, and decolonization impacts.  Social changes drive this: women’s roles are now central in many analyses, and global views incorporate colonial contributions and non-Western perspectives.
Textbooks continue trends from the 2000s, emphasizing personal narratives over strategy—U.S. involvement is depicted through soldier diaries, survivor accounts, and ethical dilemmas, with nearly all references to glory or impersonality phased out by the 2000s (a pattern likely persisting into 2020).  Visuals, such as WWII memorials, are analyzed for memory politics, especially in post-Soviet contexts.  Gender representation has transformed, with women’s wartime experiences integrated as core elements rather than side notes.
I saw the story, as well, but at another source. Seemed like it was a Massachussetts outlet with online news.
Piece described what had happened and mentioned that this perv belongs to the Coolidge Street Crips. But the reporter said that the sex of the perp was not yet clear.
The modern Feminist movement was, and still is, a communist operation.
Ghurl-power.
ThankQ.
——-
Thank You for posting that particular Q drop, I thought it was very interesting.
I’d still like to find some old history books and review them for myself. GROCK being liberally programmed was helpful in this instance, but is not always trustworthy.
It’s truly amazing that such a basic shift in society could obviously occur, yet be overlooked or forgotten as time goes by. We can’t let our history be destroyed like this.
The modern Feminist movement was, and still is, a communist operation.
Ghurl-power
———-
As foretold in Genesis 3, women will seek that power over men, which is a very unnatural state of being.
I’ve never been for women’s “liberation”. I never understood what we needed to be liberated from.
The minute you took off your bra, you had the college boys captured.
Good point... here the shooter also sacrificed himself. These acts, spiritually, help set up a power base to support further evil actions; evil builds on evil.
The 'church' is weak right now. Faith does not always appear to be the 'prime mover'. The 'Body' is hindered by apostasy, lack of shepherds, infirmities, addictions, lack of knowledge... However, revival is breaking out among the young, in schools and colleges. New energy is entering the field, bringing a renewal of commitment, re-envisioning of the order of battle, better embracing Victory in Jesus!
To the end of the age the Lord will have a church, the 'Body' of Christ, the 'Bride', called to the marriage supper of the lamb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.