Wikipedia’s Locked Steele Dossier Page Is Laced With Lies That Only Certain Users Can Correct

The Federalist ^ | July 31, 2025 | Jordan Boyd

[kiryandil]

Edits to articles under lock are limited to a specific, controlled group of Wikipedia users.

Wikipedia has long established itself as a website controlled by a coalition of partisan hacks. The latest example of the online encyclopedia’s attempt to literally rewrite the narrative appears on its article titled “Steele Dossier.”

Five paragraphs into Wikipedia’s detailed description of the document that fueled the Russia collusion hoax, the article claims that British spy Christopher Steele’s manufactured evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow “did not play any role in the January 6, 2017 intelligence community assessment of the Russian actions in the 2016 election.”

The article even went so far as to deny that the Steele Dossier was the “trigger for the opening of the Russia investigation into whether the Trump campaign was coordinating with the Russian government’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.”

---

TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: benedictobama; brennan; cankles; clapper

[kiryandil]

Benedict Obama and his stooges...

[cuz1961]

Add dictionary rape to the urinalist’s word rape.

/

[ChronicMA]

there is no restriction to posting on the talk page, and doing so is often a good way to get discussions going (if you have a good valid point about an error) and maybe getting a correction

[Jamestown1630]

I don’t trust Wikipedia on much that has to do with anything political or even subjects in other areas that my be controversial. Their whole system seems to make it too easy for partisans to slant or corrupt the articles:

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-jul-24-oe-haisch24-story.html

Like AI, you always have to check it against other sources.

(Also, look up the ‘Guerilla Skeptics’.)

[Greg123456]

DJT needs to sue the living daylights out of wikipedia

[sauropod]

Yep.