[BenLurkin]

For whom is AI chat a “trusted advisor”?

[9YearLurker]

More idiots than you’d think.

[Republican Wildcat]

There are now people who think it is a good “companion”...so, here we are.

[fuzzylogic]

It has passed the Bar exam. I do use it daily for work. From contracts to software to architecture to electronic hardware, compare and contrast technology details, etc.

I can’t imagine not having it now.

THAT SAID, I *always* make sure background information is provided in the abstract. E.g. we are ‘company X working with company Y’. Never put in specific details, you could be divulging IP...even then, described in the abstract.

Is it always correct? No. Is it always complete? No. ...but then neither are humans, which is why everything is reviewed (by humans!). Lawyers and doctors aren’t always right, sometimes very wrong. It’s at least good as a ‘sounding board’.

[Openurmind]

“For whom is AI chat a “trusted advisor”?”

Are you kidding? All day long right here on the FR I read “Well my GROK tells me...”

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

For whom is AI chat a “trusted advisor”?

Really stupid people.

You know, the kind of people who commit crimes.

[metmom]

For whom is AI chat a “trusted advisor”?

For someone dumb enough to commit a serious crime and then look up how to avoid consequences for it.

[Mastador1]

For whom is AI chat a “trusted advisor”?

Joe Biden?