What, those honkies want to be able to walk the streets at any hour without paranoia?
The keywords sure are...”charitable”. /s
Given that segregation is all the rage these days at universities, what’s the big deal?
Thanks so much, do you have any free global warming documentaries I can watch? /S
A couple of years ago, there was an article about a blacks only community being built in Georgia. The media had glowing reviews. What’s the difference?
if it is allowed to stay... exist... that place will flourish in record time.
Put people on a lie detector and ask them the question...
That’s odd. Whenever any other ethnic group says members of their ethnic group should only patronise their businesses or when they start a brand like “FUBU - For Us By Us” its not called either “racism” or “hate”. Yet when White people do it.......
That this “hate” only seems to work in one direction disqualifies these critics.
I bet you can walk around this community and not smell marijuana.
[[ but critics say it’s a dangerous step toward organised hate]]
Do those same critics think that calling for the elimination of jews is a “dangerous step towards organized hate”?
https://returntotheland.org/about
About Us
Return to the Land is a private membership association (PMA) for individuals and families with traditional views and European ancestry. We hold events and conferences, and we help groups of our members form European heritage communities.
Vision
We seek to create a decentralized movement, formed of various individuals and societies returning to the land. We will promote strong families with common ancestry, and raise the next generation in an environment that reflects our traditional values. We will facilitate economic and social harmony between all groups and individuals in our movement. Above all, we will continue to engage in a never-ending pursuit of excellence, refusing to lower our standards or lose sight of our goals.
Mission
We will return to the land to separate ourselves from a failing modern society, and we will make positive cultural changes in ourselves and in our ancestral communities.
Goals
To facilitate individuals and groups that share common ancestry to purchase land in rural areas.
To facilitate media activities to promote our movement.
To create many independent and fully-functioning parallel societies.
To teach, share, and develop successful methods of garnering independence and building community.
To cultivate wholesomeness, beauty, health, and hope in a trying world.
Legal Disclaimer
RTTL does not engage in the sale or rental of real estate.
I don’t care about a “whites only” silliness.
What would appeal to me is a “CONSERVATIVES ONLY”
Is that discriminatory?
People can do whatever they want, freedom of association and all that, but on a personal level I’m not a fan of any kind of separatist group no matter what the basis. There always seem to ultimately be some pretty negative consequences associated with it, sometimes horrific, and often affecting the people that are members themselves.
No hoops for you, Fellas.
Why would anyone find this to be upsetting?
to avoid the progressive efforts to force unwelcome people into their community...
they should incorporate the land of the town to be owned by a corporation.
only shareholders would be allowed to own a home.
So if blacks want a black only housing units it is fine, but it is racist if Whites do it... GOT IT...
Personally not my cup of tea but what’s the big deal? Other groups don’t catch any flack when they do something like this. These people aren’t hurting anybody. What happened to freedom of association? From a legal point of view maybe they should have structured it a different way to exclude others because I’m sure the ADL will go after them and they will face expensive legal battles. Ironic since the ADL has no problem supporting a Jewish ethnic state they just hate the idea of whites having one.
This is a ridiculous proposition.
They will run afoul of the law the further they go along.
1. Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act (FHA) prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, or financing of housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability.
• Prohibited conduct includes:
• Refusing to sell or rent to someone because of race
• Publishing statements indicating racial preferences
• Imposing conditions or restrictions on ownership or occupancy based on race
If the association sells land or homes only to white people, it’s almost certainly a violation of the FHA, even if the land is technically “private.”
2. Civil Rights Act of 1866
This older law is even more direct than the FHA. It states:
“All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property.”
It applies regardless of whether a transaction is public or private. So even if someone tries to argue “freedom of association” or “private property rights,” racial restrictions in property sales are illegal.
3. Restrictive covenants base on race are illegal
In Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
Racially restrictive covenants are unenforceable in court because state enforcement would constitute state action, violating the Equal Protection Clause.
Furthermore, if someone married or adopted a non-white, they couldn’t kick them out based on volumes of civil rights law.
The reason this is so stupid is that it involves property. The optics are horrible and they’re just asking for trouble.
If they want to only associate with whites only and exercise their freedom of association they should just form a members only club that doesn’t involve a public business or real estate. If they want to be left alone, they shouldn’t publicize their activities so that detractors won’t try to seek ways of dismantling their group.
Remember the first rule of fight club is that nobody talks about fight club.