Posted on 07/25/2025 10:33:35 PM PDT by RandFan
Warning: This report contains themes of racism and homophobia which viewers may find upsetting.
Sky's Tom Cheshire meets the people behind a self-declared whites-only town in rural Arkansas.
The group says it’s about freedom and community - but critics say it’s a dangerous step toward organised hate.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
private corporations can do anything they want and are not bound by discrimination laws... unless they are publicly traded
So if blacks want a black only housing units it is fine, but it is racist if Whites do it... GOT IT...
Personally not my cup of tea but what’s the big deal? Other groups don’t catch any flack when they do something like this. These people aren’t hurting anybody. What happened to freedom of association? From a legal point of view maybe they should have structured it a different way to exclude others because I’m sure the ADL will go after them and they will face expensive legal battles. Ironic since the ADL has no problem supporting a Jewish ethnic state they just hate the idea of whites having one.
This is a ridiculous proposition.
They will run afoul of the law the further they go along.
1. Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act (FHA) prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, or financing of housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability.
• Prohibited conduct includes:
• Refusing to sell or rent to someone because of race
• Publishing statements indicating racial preferences
• Imposing conditions or restrictions on ownership or occupancy based on race
If the association sells land or homes only to white people, it’s almost certainly a violation of the FHA, even if the land is technically “private.”
2. Civil Rights Act of 1866
This older law is even more direct than the FHA. It states:
“All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property.”
It applies regardless of whether a transaction is public or private. So even if someone tries to argue “freedom of association” or “private property rights,” racial restrictions in property sales are illegal.
3. Restrictive covenants base on race are illegal
In Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
Racially restrictive covenants are unenforceable in court because state enforcement would constitute state action, violating the Equal Protection Clause.
Furthermore, if someone married or adopted a non-white, they couldn’t kick them out based on volumes of civil rights law.
The reason this is so stupid is that it involves property. The optics are horrible and they’re just asking for trouble.
If they want to only associate with whites only and exercise their freedom of association they should just form a members only club that doesn’t involve a public business or real estate. If they want to be left alone, they shouldn’t publicize their activities so that detractors won’t try to seek ways of dismantling their group.
Remember the first rule of fight club is that nobody talks about fight club.
I'd love to see a "Conservative only" town.
I was under the impression that the association at least initially sold plots of land to whites only even if it’s private.
That won’t fly.
Are there restrictive covenants?
They’re going to catch a lot of flak. If you become a member, you’ll need a lawyer.
(George Washington stated that he would allow Muslim and Jewish immigrants if they were \\\”good workmen\\\”:
*\\\”If they are good workmen, they may be of Asia, Africa, or Europe. They may be Mahometans [Mohammedans/Muslims], Jews, or Christians of any Sect, or they may be Atheists.\\\”*
-George Washington, in a 1784 letter to Tench Tighman)
It’s obvious he changed his mind about them because in the 1790 Naturalization Act, the very first legislation by the first Congress on rules for naturalization, only White people were the only ones allowed to be citizens of the new country.
No Asians, Muzzies, blacks, or indentured servants.
“private corporations can do anything they want and are not bound by discrimination laws... unless they are publicly traded”
Wow you are way way off.
Private corporations and companies are subject to state, federal civil rights and anti discrimination laws if they:
• Employ people
• Sells goods or services
• Provides housing
• Is open to the public in any way
Applicable laws include:
• Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (employment)
• Fair Housing Act (housing discrimination)
• Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (public accommodations)
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Try opening a whites only motel and see what happens.
I don’t like any of these enclaves Jewish, Black, Islamic or whites only.
Go ahead and form your own clubs, churches etc. But don’t create enclaves that are based on racial property restrictions because that will inevitably lead to de facto governments outside the established state, local federal government.
How about creating an Islamic enclave in Texas or Dearborn? How about some Sharia law? Maybe a little money from Qatar?
Any different than Black run “cities” in Georgia, moslem cities in Texas, White run Elohim City in Oklahoma? I thought Arkansas had other such cities in the north part of the State, stuck so far back in the hills they have to pump in sunshine.
sorry, i was thinking of democrat run corporations which are not held to any discrimination standards
Thanks. Eye opening.
These people are either very clever or very stupid.
No doubt, they’ll eventually be in court for this.
1. Are they doing this so that they’ll lose and set a precedent that other groups, Jews, Blacks, Islamist too cannot form these enclaves which can lead to autonomous governments? Then they should put up some lame arguments and get the result that shuts down these dangerous Islamic communities. That would be smart.
2. Or, do they really believe that can win and will try to make a good case pushing freedom of association issues? Allah would go for that one. In that case they should look for funding from Qatar. Not smart.
They could have gotten around all those laws by structuring themselves as a private club. Maybe they were looking for donations and figured this was the way to go about raising funds and attracting additional membership. Buy now they’ve opened themselves up to legal challenges.
Review
I’m glad they’re doing this and hope this goes up the legal food chain so that it can be a case law precedent when they lose.
If they lose, the precedent can be used to go after these Islamic exclaves.
The Islamic threat is of greater importance here.
I don’t blame them. White people are experiencing black fatigue. The revolting subculture that blacks have created for themselves is repulsive to normal people.
I actually find myself longing for the days of pre-integration. We are on the verge of moving to our rural property which is in an area of zero diversity and I can’t wait to get there.
Go ahead and form your own clubs, churches etc. But don’t create enclaves that are based on racial property restrictions because that will inevitably lead to de facto governments outside the established state, local federal government.
Religious and/or racial enclaves should be banned.
They're attempting to create one in Minneapolis.
The Muslims in this country are already attempting something similar to this in Texas. Quite frankly they should never had been allowed in this country to begin with. Islam is just too all encompassing of the lives of its adherents and they are too aggressive in pushing their religion, culture and views onto others. Things are coming to a head in this country and I wouldn’t be surprised if a civil war or revolution occurs in another decade or so.
Right now people are mostly financially comfortable and not inclined to rock the boat too much. But that’s about to radically change soon with the loss of the dollar as reserve currency (among other things) and when a good chunk of the population is financially desperate disruptive things start to happen. Things that seem impossible or unlikely now might not seem so crazy as conditions change. Once the boomers die off whites will become a minority. Many of the zoomer generation are already acutely aware of this and becoming more racially conscious as a result. So who knows where all of this is heading.
whites deserve their own reservations, like the Native Americans, since open borders genocide / replacement is the official policy of the government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.