To: Governor Dinwiddie
This is actually just as important to future combat as aerial refueling is to modern air combat. A surveillance satellite that can be autonomously refueled can be retasked and moved far more frequently, without having an hard per-unit limit on how many moves it can make.
A *combat* satellite could be reloaded and resupplied by almost the same method.
6 posted on
07/15/2025 9:23:16 AM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
Got it! Thanks for the explanation. I guess I'm jaded from growing up with all the Russian cold war
propaganda.
"TASS has revealed that the Soviets have launched an ant into orbit around Planet X …
yadda yadda." I'm still mad at the commies for letting Laika die.

9 posted on
07/15/2025 9:31:15 AM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
To: Spktyr; MtnClimber; Red Badger; SunkenCiv
Future combat in space. And present combat in space too - since one of two satellites was designed and built and then launched 5 years ago.
But.
A stable, close robot-controlled remote rendezvous is necessary for refueling rendezvous and hookup, but is not necessarily a successful refueling. Yet.
10 posted on
07/15/2025 9:31:17 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson