1 posted on
07/10/2025 8:31:47 AM PDT by
Signalman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Signalman
A Bush judge. They can be just as bad as any appointed by Obumble or Buydung.
2 posted on
07/10/2025 8:34:01 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Kamala defines herself in just 4 words..."Nothing comes to mind.")
To: Signalman
Another Feral, Anti-Trump “Dipstick judge” is out of his lane. This boy doesn’t have the authority to do this. He needs to go impress his girlfriends somewhere else.
3 posted on
07/10/2025 8:34:18 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(DemonRAT politicians say tha pt their voters are all murderers who want American blood for illegals.)
To: Signalman
“It is the greatest privilege that exists in the world.”
Yeah.
That’s why you don’t allow illegal aliens to decide who gets that privilege simply by dumping their kid 1 foot inside the fence.
4 posted on
07/10/2025 8:34:37 AM PDT by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: Signalman
More judicial tyranny. It’s the new Lawfare.
5 posted on
07/10/2025 8:36:02 AM PDT by
paulcissa
(Politicians want you disarmed because they intend on doing things you would shoot them for.)
To: Signalman
Just ignore them, what can this or any Judge do?
To: Signalman
Apparently, the judge can’t read English!
To: Signalman
Given the recent Supreme Court ruling, any ruling like this needs to be ignored.
9 posted on
07/10/2025 8:41:06 AM PDT by
Kazan
To: Signalman
a vacuous, patently unlawful “order” that isn’t worth using as toilet paper
it is ‘orders’ like this that have bred such widespread contempt for the law and the judiciary
and THAT is a very serious problem (leaving the false construct of “birthright citizenship” completely aside)
,
10 posted on
07/10/2025 8:41:28 AM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Signalman
All those hailing SCOTUS tossing the nationwide injunction nonsense seemed to miss the fact that if the judges could abuse that, they could abuse class action law as well. Typical of that scumbag Roberts to support a ruling that allowed a backdoor against Trump. Now the US will have to appeal the class status.
The funny thing is all those in the class will have to register as being born of temporary visitors or illegals. Something ICE might find handy.
11 posted on
07/10/2025 8:44:19 AM PDT by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: Signalman
“ District Judge makes himself King of America “
12 posted on
07/10/2025 8:45:33 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
To: Signalman
Time to rein-in the black robes.
13 posted on
07/10/2025 8:46:54 AM PDT by
ptsal
(Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
To: Signalman
One of the plaintiffs is a pregnant woman.
Suddenly the unborn are people WITH rights.
Trump should immediately make a statement that a NH judge has decided the unborn are people with rights. He should then sign an EO disallowing abortions nationwide.
14 posted on
07/10/2025 8:48:36 AM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: Signalman
He waited until the USSC went on its Trans continental vacation escape to issue this ruling, which was specifically slapped down by the USSC in June's rul8ngs.
So there's our "existential threat to democracy itself", and it ain't Donald Trump.
15 posted on
07/10/2025 8:49:27 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Today's Democrat Party is nothing but very bad performance art. )
To: Signalman
Depending on the nature of the class, this still is better than a bunch of individual lawsuits because an adverse decision against the class may prevent other actions. You get one case, but you don’t get fifty where the government has to win every single one.
To: Signalman
Trump should use the injunction a toilet paper
18 posted on
07/10/2025 8:51:48 AM PDT by
ProudDeplorable
(Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
To: Signalman
The USSC has made their decision. If it’s not the “law of the land” and a lower court can ignore its ruling, what’s the point of having a USSC?
Did I miss something stated in the Constitution?
21 posted on
07/10/2025 8:53:28 AM PDT by
Signalman
(When your enemy is digging himself a hole, don't take away his shovel.)
To: Signalman
Crockette leads all the RAT “man buns” in the latest poll for the Texas Senate seat. Everybody knows Paxton has that seat in the bag so the RATS are going with a bag full of female sexual organs as their big winner.
23 posted on
07/10/2025 8:54:03 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(DemonRAT politicians say tha pt their voters are all murderers who want American blood for illegals.)
To: Signalman
I have family in NH and was just recently visiting.
NH is about as far as you can go from being touched by illegals.
I was there for a week and saw nothing but good Americans who’s families have clearly been here for a very long time.
Send him to TX or AZ for a week on a paid vacation and he might change is tune.
25 posted on
07/10/2025 8:59:36 AM PDT by
Zathras
(.)
To: Signalman
Has ANYONE read the Judge’s Order?
I thought so.
26 posted on
07/10/2025 9:01:32 AM PDT by
Fury
To: Signalman
It’s the class action status that allowed him to circumvent the SCOTUS decision. I don’t think his accepting that status will hold up on appeal.
It is not as simple as saying “I agree these people are a class entitled to such status.” That has to be proven and the proofs are spelled out in Federal law.
29 posted on
07/10/2025 9:03:58 AM PDT by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson