Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2025 8:34:54 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger
Isn't pyrolysis what Bill Clinton had?
2 posted on 07/08/2025 8:38:03 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Solid carbon? That’s coal, isn’t it?


4 posted on 07/08/2025 8:42:13 AM PDT by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

This is an A.I. answer about the safety of hydrogen fuel.

While hydrogen fuel is highly flammable and can pose risks if not handled properly, it is generally considered safe when handled according to established safety protocols and regulations. It’s important to understand both the potential hazards and the safety measures associated with hydrogen to ensure its safe use.
Potential Hazards:

Flammability:
Hydrogen is highly flammable and can ignite easily, potentially leading to fires and explosions.

Invisible Flame:
Hydrogen flames are often difficult to see, which can make it challenging to detect leaks or fires.
Explosiveness:
Hydrogen can form explosive mixtures with air, particularly in enclosed spaces, increasing the risk of explosions if not handled properly.
Rapid Dissipation:
While hydrogen’s rapid dissipation can reduce the risk of ignition in open spaces, it can also lead to accumulation in confined areas, potentially creating a hazardous situation.
Hydrogen Embrittlement:
Hydrogen can weaken metal structures, potentially causing them to crack or fail under stress.
Frostbite:
Contact with liquid hydrogen can cause severe frostbite and tissue damage.

Safety Measures:

Proper Ventilation:
Adequate ventilation is crucial to prevent hydrogen from accumulating in confined spaces, minimizing the risk of explosions and asphyxiation.

Leak Detection:
Specialized leak detection equipment and procedures are necessary to identify and address leaks promptly.
Pressure Management:
Proper pressure management and control systems are essential to prevent over-pressurization and potential explosions.
Protective Gear:
Workers handling hydrogen should wear appropriate protective gear, including gloves and eye protection, to prevent frostbite and other injuries.
Training and Procedures:
Thorough training and established safety procedures are crucial for all personnel handling hydrogen.
Infrastructure Design:
Hydrogen storage and transportation infrastructure must be designed and maintained to the highest safety standards to minimize risks.

In Conclusion:
Hydrogen can be a safe and effective fuel source when handled with proper precautions and adhering to established safety protocols. Understanding the potential hazards and implementing appropriate safety measures are critical for mitigating risks associated with hydrogen fuel.

I do not know if the auto industry has adequately addressed all the hydrogen safety questions.


8 posted on 07/08/2025 8:43:12 AM PDT by Wuli (uire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
This accidental reaction was quietly reported within the company and then forgotten for nearly two decades. “Back then, nobody cared because nobody cared about methane pyrolysis, about hydrogen,” said Massimiliano Pieri, now CEO of Tulum Energy.

Lots of great inventions came from research/lab 'accidents'...

12 posted on 07/08/2025 8:48:19 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrats judge themselves by thier 'intentions' NOT by their results. It's one reason they fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

These “breakthroughs” never seem to pan out


14 posted on 07/08/2025 8:57:35 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

How can hydrogen cost $1.50 per kilogram? Do you the scale on the ceiling?


15 posted on 07/08/2025 8:58:33 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

CO2 is not a pollutant.


16 posted on 07/08/2025 8:58:34 AM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“In this case, the furnace was splitting methane into two valuable byproducts: hydrogen gas and solid carbon.”

Interesting development for the future of methane.


23 posted on 07/08/2025 9:22:27 AM PDT by TheDon (Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Not really that great.
Basically, we can just burn the Methane and get a lot more net energy that way, but that would release the “terrible” Co2.
If this is a byproduct of making steel or similar product, then maybe there is something good in this. Otherwise, it will take more energy to make the hydrogen, than we can get back burning the hydrogen.

Let’s face it, all the greenies and the media wishful thinking cannot defeat the second law of thermodynamics!

So yet another feel good project, design to waste energy to make it “green”!

Basically, we can just burn the Methane and get a lot more net energy that way, but that would release the “terrible” Co2.


28 posted on 07/08/2025 9:41:25 AM PDT by AZJeep (sane )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; All

The reason to convert methane to hydrogen and solid carbon is if you don’t want to release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Methane itself is a useful fuel, and is far easier to use and transport than hydrogen.


29 posted on 07/08/2025 9:42:18 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

.


32 posted on 07/08/2025 11:31:36 AM PDT by redinIllinois (Pro-life, accoountant, gun-oktotin' Grandma - multi issue voter )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

It takes Legacy Energy, Coal, NG, Petroleum, Gasoline, or burning wood, to make “alternative energy”.

We need to use more so called “Climate destroying fuel”, making energy sources than we would use just using the fuel sources stated in my first paragraph. That includes the energy needed to make solar panels, concrete, Wind turbines or digging up rare earth metals, for electric STORING batteries.


33 posted on 07/08/2025 12:57:06 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

the unasked question is how efficient is it. How many watts out are there for every watt in.


37 posted on 07/08/2025 6:47:56 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those [Leftists] struggling with inferiority complexes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson