Skip to comments.
Minimum wage hikes take effect for 880,000 workers across the U.S.
Fast Company ^
| July 01, 2025
| Sarah Bregel
Posted on 07/01/2025 1:03:52 PM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: dragnet2
as did greedy Americans who hired illegals as lawn care, nanny’s, house cleaners etc etc and paid them cash as opposed to hiring legal citizens with businesses or self employed trying to make their living.
Too many Americans want to cut corners themselves, then blame others for why we have a problem.
41
posted on
07/01/2025 4:15:35 PM PDT
by
b4me
(Pray, and let God change you. He knows better than you or anyone else, who He made you to be.)
To: Red Badger
Restaurants closing like flies in Chicago!😀
42
posted on
07/01/2025 6:12:00 PM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: central_va
No, they are not. The higher wage costs are pushed onto the customer as much as possible, but at the higher price, consumers buy less...especially in the short run. Less sold means fewer resources needed, including labor. Unless the demand for the product is perfectly price inelastic (almost never), price goes up and less is sold and some resources become unemployed...including labor.
43
posted on
07/01/2025 6:42:15 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: dragnet2
No, I'm not okay with it, but until the border is really closed, I understand why businesses hire them, but I don't agree with it. To stop it, the illegals should be sent back, but the employer should also be punished. However, I don't know the best way for that punishment to take place. If you put the owner in jail, the business may have to close throwing legitimate workers out of a job. Fines might do the job, provided they don't force closure of the business. It's a tight wire to walk...
44
posted on
07/01/2025 6:48:00 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: dragnet2
It’s the gov’t who controls the flood gates and until now, they did nothing to stop it.
45
posted on
07/01/2025 6:50:06 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: napscoordinator
Read my post...that’s not what I said. Also, this is not a 50 cent raise. In some cases, it’s a $4/hr change. Employers will respond to that.
46
posted on
07/01/2025 6:52:02 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: econjack
There is no difference between the cost of labor and any other cost. Labor is a commodity.
47
posted on
07/02/2025 6:20:54 AM PDT
by
central_va
(The I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va
I'm not arguing that point. What I'm saying is that the employer cannot push ALL of the increased labor costs onto the consumer. Except for cases where the demand is completely vertical (i.e., perfectly price inelastic...almost never), any increase in any cost is shared between the company and its customers. See:
https://www.econgraphs.org/textbooks/intermediate_micro/firm_theory/competitive_firm/price_and_wage_responses
Note, you can drag the parameters using the bullets on the right side of the graph.
48
posted on
07/02/2025 7:33:35 AM PDT
by
econjack
To: econjack
You don’t seem to get it. The government and big business are riding in the same limo. C’mon. Big biz donated to corrupt politicians to ensure that lawless violent border stayed wide open decade after decades while they gave the taxpayers lip service while looting them. The insiders never had any intention of securing the border prior to Trump. Low wage labor was their golden goose. Profits regardless of consequences.
49
posted on
07/03/2025 9:10:06 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson