NO.
No. The Government needs an overhaul to bring it back inline with the express limits in the Constitution. The USC needs to be mostly gutted as a large portion of the crap that has been added to it is blatantly outside the scope of the US Con.
Looking right at you USC Title 18 Chapt 44...
Following what it says would be a good start.
I’d happily get the 5.5” U.S. Constitution floppy and do a fresh install before we stated patching the hell out of it. I don’t believe the Constitution needs an overhaul, the electorate and the elected officials need one.
No - people’s thinking needs an overhaul.
The answer is NO.
It’s been “overhauled” 27 times already. There’s a clear process for “overhauling” it.
It is the most brilliant concept for self-governance ever created by Man. It is timeless and adaptable via the amendment process. Its biggest achievement is holding government at bay (even though it is not doing as good a job as I would like in that regard). The Founders never anticipated the rise of a Fourth Branch, the Regulatory State.
Yeah, we need George and Alex Soros and all the other foreign billionaires to have a new mission to reign Hell down on the US.
I’d be happy to see the 16th and 26th amendments repealed.
But is our Constitution good enough today?
————
Our Constitution was inspired by God. The notion of changing our Constitution is idiotic, much like trying to change God’s written word, the Bible.
That said, we are witnessing the Methodists, Presbyterians, Anglicans, etc trying to do just that….and they are splitting up, fracturing and blowing away into non existence for it.
Proposed Amendment 28:
Christ Jesus, the only and eternally begotten Son of the Father, is King.
Also make some changes to citizenship and immigration. I would definitely include a provision giving states the right to control their own borders with other countries. The only exception would be Federal controlled border crossings.
Oh, and gives states standing to challenge the grant of any federal payments or benefits to individuals that are in violation of the law or Constitution.
Except for clarification of 14th Amendment:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States”
When an illegal gives birth in the US and then leaves, is their newborn subject to the jurisdiction of the US and for that matter if their parents stay and invite all their relatives to join them, are they then subject to the jurisdiction of the US? I don’t believe the founders ever intended that Amendment to be used for anything except give the freed salves the right to have the same freedoms as other natural born citizens enjoy.
No!
No, it needs to be followed.
No, it needs to be followed - something activist judges refuse to do.
Repealing every amendment after the 15th would be a step in the right direction.
Yes. The House and Señate Jañitor Crews and Lawn manicurists should also be able to vote for the Big, Beautiful Circle Jerk Bill! Gotta slow this boy down until Zohrani the Rapper gets on the wagon. This is gonna need some changes of the Constitution signed off by goofy Dipstick Court “judgies” and their illegal alien invader boyfriends.
NO!!!!
It needs to be followed.
LMAO. We don’t even follow the Constitution. Most people don’t know what a constitutional republic is, nor do they have the faculties to be able to reason.
So tell me again how a new constitution would serve us?