Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top FDA Official Admits She Refused the Covid-19 Vaccine While Pregnant
Brownstone ^ | 6/16/25 | Maryanne Demasi

Posted on 06/16/2025 6:37:09 PM PDT by CFW

One of the most powerful figures at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has admitted she refused the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine while pregnant—even as her agency promoted it as “safe and effective” for all pregnant women.

Dr Sara Brenner’s explosive disclosure, made on 15 May 2025 at the MAHA Institute Round Table in Washington, DC, is as revealing as it is troubling.

A preventive medicine physician, Brenner has worked at the FDA since 2019. As the FDA’s Principal Deputy Commissioner—and briefly its Acting Commissioner—Brenner was at the centre of decision-making.

[snip]

Brenner explained that her decision was driven by a lack of safety data, particularly around the biodistribution of the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)—the tiny fat particles used to deliver the mRNA into cells.

“It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were…That was my primary concern, and that exposure I was very concerned about,” said Brenner.

(Excerpt) Read more at brownstone.org ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: covid; fda; pregnancy; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
While the FDA was recommending the vaccine to everyone, including pregnant women, a top FDA official refused the vaccine because she was pregnant.

There are a lot of people who should go to prison for their lies.

1 posted on 06/16/2025 6:37:09 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

2 posted on 06/16/2025 6:41:07 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

And pregnant women were forced to take the vaccine in order to keep their jobs. Criminal.


3 posted on 06/16/2025 6:45:02 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Yes

They violated people’s privacy rights.

They coerced people.

Some people lost their jobs.

It was a horrible display of government over-reach, mass censorship and propaganda all coming together.

Those in positions of authority that made decisions should NEVER be allowed in a position of public trust again. They made decisions using the powers of their office which violated peoples rights.


4 posted on 06/16/2025 6:47:47 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Fire her. She is unethical. She directly caused harm to others by refusing to tell the truth.


5 posted on 06/16/2025 6:48:46 PM PDT by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Congress exempted itself and all of its staff while condemning the American people to it.


6 posted on 06/16/2025 6:50:21 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Arrest her and waterboard her……shouldn’t take long before she squeals on higher ups.


7 posted on 06/16/2025 6:52:26 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were…That was my primary concern, and that exposure I was very concerned about,” said Brenner.


Then WHY did she recommend it for everyone else?? She belongs in PRISON!


8 posted on 06/16/2025 6:56:06 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“her decision was driven by a lack of safety data”

That’s exactly what drove most of us to refuse the vax.

That, and the fact that we were pretty much mandated to do it. Beware of government mandates.


9 posted on 06/16/2025 6:56:46 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“Rules for thee but not for ME!

Heads need to roll. And what happened to the Auto Pen investigation?


10 posted on 06/16/2025 7:00:47 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

My friends wife miscarried because of it.


11 posted on 06/16/2025 7:04:00 PM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (‘Never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

“My friend’s wife miscarried because of it.”


Both my d-i-l and my cousin’s daughter miscarried at around 4 1/2 to 5 months. Neither of them got the vaccine, but everyone at their place of work did. Both of them were in constant close proximity to just-vaccinated co-workers. Both had previous healthy pregnancies and carried their children to birth with no problem. I’m convinced the shedding of the spike proteins caused those miscarriages.


12 posted on 06/16/2025 7:16:19 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

When you are in the dark, don’t force people to stumble around with you.


13 posted on 06/16/2025 7:28:53 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

14 posted on 06/16/2025 7:29:26 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Question for a Free Republic Lawyer: The drug companies have immunity from lawsuits concerning vaccines, as they should as all have potential for harm but far more people are helped by modern vaccines than hurt. It is a game of risk benefit ratio.

My question is does this apply to the covid MRNA shot it is not a vaccine. Does it apply to the covid shot when the Drug companies submitted false data in order to get emergency approval. It should also be noted the MRNA Covid shot, was designated as a vaccine by the FDA, it is not a vaccine. I suspect this was to give the drug companies legal cover but I may be wrong.

Why did Tony Fauci need a blanket presidential pardon?


15 posted on 06/16/2025 7:42:53 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

And wetbacks were exempted because they were under the protection of their own countries—gotta respect that, right? and not subject to our jurisdiction, while of course (says the left) they have all the legal protections of American citizens because in thst sense they are subject to our jurisdiction.
With of course, none the responsibilities.

Don’t forget, these are the same people who will demand we trust them if, say, an EMP sends the entire country into a tailspin. The people who couldn’t or wouldn’t take care of one region of North Carolina, or a toxic train spill in Ohio.


16 posted on 06/16/2025 8:00:18 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This is despicable and disgusting!


17 posted on 06/16/2025 8:15:28 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Congress excused its members from receiving the Covid19 ‘vaccine’. Odd choice given it was popular to accuse the non-vaccinated of killing us all back then.

When I searched the Internet just now to confirm what I believe to be true, I received a vague answer, which is exactly how I recall the FDA’s non-response to questions like that.
~~~~~~~~~~

“Did the FDA require its employees to receive a Covid19 vaccine?”

AI Answer: FDA Vaccine Mandate for Employees
The FDA itself does not appear to have a specific mandate mentioned in the context for its employees to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. However, it is noted that the executive order requiring federal workers to be vaccinated applies to agencies such as the CDC, FDA, and NIAID, which are part of the executive branch.
This suggests that while the FDA is part of the executive branch, the context does not explicitly state that the FDA required its employees to receive the vaccine. The focus is more on the broader federal workforce and specific agencies within the executive branch.


18 posted on 06/16/2025 8:21:31 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

So were the Chinese students.


19 posted on 06/16/2025 8:21:52 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Get. A. Rope.


20 posted on 06/16/2025 8:45:21 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson