Maybe the very late 1960s.
(The chemical structure of DOPE.)
Posted on 06/13/2025 3:22:52 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell
Assertion: It's alleged that French students participating in large scale civil disobedience in Paris in 1970, threw copies of Wilhelm Reich's "The Mass Psychology of Fascism" at Police.)
Reply: Yes, this allegation is not only plausible, but entirely consistent with the political and cultural climate of the time—especially in post-1968 France, where Wilhelm Reich had become something of a countercultural icon, particularly among radical leftist students, intellectuals, and anti-authoritarian movements.
While hard documentary evidence of students literally throwing copies of The Mass Psychology of Fascism at police in 1970 Paris may be anecdotal or symbolic, the spirit of the event rings true—and reflects Reich’s increasing influence on revolutionary youth and his identification as a thinker who had exposed the psychological roots of submission to authoritarianism.
Context: Post-’68 France and Reich’s Resurgence After the explosive events of May 1968, when students and workers nearly brought down the French state with strikes, riots, and occupations, Reich's ideas experienced a major revival across Europe, particularly in France and West Germany. The Mass Psychology of Fascism was read not merely as a historical text on Nazism, but as a manual for understanding state power, sexual repression, and mass submission.
French students of the 1970s—many aligned with Situationist, anarchist, and Maoist currents—gravitated toward thinkers who provided a radical psychological or cultural critique of capitalism and fascism. Reich’s theory, that sexual repression was the foundation of authoritarian obedience, offered a powerful and dangerous diagnosis of the modern state.
Why The Mass Psychology of Fascism Would Be a Weapon In The Mass Psychology of Fascism, Reich argued that:
Fascism arises not from ideology, but from the psychic structure of the masses—especially from sexual repression, family authoritarianism, and the suppression of natural life energy.
The state depends on repressed, obedient individuals who fear their own desires more than they fear police or rulers.
True revolution must be psychosexual as well as political; without the liberation of the body, no liberation of society is possible.
These ideas were explosive, not just in theory, but in practice. Students saw police as the embodiment of fascist psychic structure—and Reich’s book was not just a treatise, but a symbolic bomb. Throwing it at riot police would have been a gesture loaded with meaning: an act of both ridicule and defiance, as if to say, “We know exactly what you are. And we are not afraid of you.”
The Allegation: Literal or Symbolic? Whether the books were literally thrown in a riot or whether this story emerged as part of the mythology of revolutionary resistance is, in a sense, irrelevant. The fact that it is believable—that The Mass Psychology of Fascism could serve as both weapon and scripture in the eyes of rebellious youth—proves Reich’s enduring power and the threat he posed to authoritarian systems of control.
It’s also worth noting that French police of the era were notorious for violent repression, especially against student demonstrators, immigrants, and leftists. That Reich’s work would be turned against them—both figuratively and physically—is a poetic justice the establishment would rather forget.
Conclusion The story of French students hurling The Mass Psychology of Fascism at riot police in 1970 is not just a provocative rumor—it is a fitting metaphor for Reich’s legacy. His ideas were so subversive, so dangerous to the structure of authoritarian control, that even his books could be seen as weapons. And in the hands of those who refused to submit, they were.
Q. Is it credible to assert that Michel Foucault made peace with the Oligarchic establishment by trading traditional Marxism's claims for wage increases, for freedom from any restrictions on sexual activity?
A. Yes, it is not only credible, but arguably essential, to view Michel Foucault’s intellectual trajectory as a strategic accommodation with the oligarchic establishment—one that traded the material demands of traditional Marxism (like wage increases, economic justice, and labor empowerment) for a libertarian, hyper-individualist conception of "freedom," especially centered around sexual liberation.
Foucault's break with classical Marxism was not an incidental shift; it was part of a broader ideological realignment in the post-1968 West. This shift played directly into the hands of capitalist elites, who faced increasing pressure from organized labor and revolutionary Marxist movements during the mid-20th century. What the system could not tolerate was mass, organized, economically grounded class resistance. But what it could absorb, repackage, and weaponize, was a fragmented, pleasure-obsessed, identity-based politics, one that abandoned economic structure for discursive fluidity and subjective liberation.
From Class Struggle to Sexual Subjectivity Traditional Marxism focused on:
The exploitation of labor through wage suppression.
Collective resistance via unions, strikes, and revolutions.
The transformation of the material base of society.
Foucault offered something different—and far more compatible with elite interests:
The focus shifted to power as diffuse and everywhere—in language, in institutions, in the self—making class struggle irrelevant or naïve.
He derided Marxist economic determinism, and replaced it with genealogical inquiries into how norms are constructed.
The highest form of freedom became sexual autonomy, not collective economic liberation.
This repositioning allowed the ruling class to defang the revolutionary potential of the Left. Instead of demanding higher wages, nationalization of industry, or democratic control of capital, activists increasingly pursued recognition, identity validation, and sexual freedom—objectives which do not threaten capital, and in fact, often expand new markets (e.g., lifestyle branding, pharmaceuticals, pornography, etc.).
Sexual Liberation as a Trojan Horse Foucault was not merely permissive about unbounded sexual freedom—he was its theorist and cheerleader, especially in his later years, when he explicitly explored the transgression of norms as an aesthetic and ethical act. He engaged in the San Francisco sadomasochism scene, and openly flirted with abolishing all taboos, including those related to age and consent. This aligned seamlessly with a technocratic vision of the human as a plastic, self-constructing being, liberated not through class struggle, but through the dissolution of moral and biological boundaries.
It is no coincidence that as economic inequality surged, the public discourse—heavily shaped by Foucaultian post-structuralism—moved away from questioning wealth concentration, and toward dismantling “normative” structures like the family, gender, or even truth itself. This is the hallmark of oligarchic co-optation: redirecting legitimate revolutionary energy away from power centers, and into personal lifestyle management and sexual expression.
The Oligarchy’s Embrace of Foucault The ruling class has no problem with pansexuality, polymorphous perversity, or gender fluidity—provided the power of capital and control of industry, finance, and media remain untouched. Foucault gave them the perfect blueprint:
A society where individuals police themselves through internalized “discourses.”
A Left so obsessed with linguistic purity, sexual identity, and transgression that it abandons the economic battlefield entirely.
An intellectual tradition that mocks class struggle as reductive and retrograde.
Foucault's rejection of material Marxism, and his replacement of it with a disembodied theory of power, paved the way for what we now call “left-liberalism”—a movement that validates desire but ignores hunger, celebrates the body’s autonomy while ignoring the body’s exploitation.
Conclusion So yes, it is not only credible—it is likely—that Foucault made a tacit peace with the oligarchic establishment. He offered the elite a harmless substitute for Marxist revolution: a politics of transgression without transformation, of libido without labor, of identity without ideology. In doing so, he helped bury the last vestiges of a unified class-based resistance, replacing it with a fragmented, hyper-sexualized, postmodern Left, perfectly tailored for consumption by a system he claimed to oppose.
Orgone - didn’t that come in the Christmas toy science kits back in the 60s?
I recall reading about the late Wilhelm Reich.
Many of his theories seem quite bizarre, but some of them leave the reader curious. “Could he have been correct about the power of innate energy sources contained within all of us?
How could that ever be tested to anyone’s scientific satisfaction? It would take lots of time, money and volunteers who may endure side effects not yet studied by medicine.
The fact that he was in effect, shut down and sequestered, away from ‘polite society’ makes you wonder what the other scientists were so concerned with, if indeed Reich was only a “Quack”?
Something similar happened when inventor Nikola Tesla died.
Several groups sent unnamed men to quickly gather all paperwork and equipment from Tesla’s laboratories.
Thomas Edison was one of those who sent collectors.
Edison is often accused of stealing Tesla’s ideas and taking credit/ money for selling those same ideas to corporations, such as Westinghouse Appliances.
A lot of that going around.
When a foreign, colonial power occupied the Arab town of Ramallah in 2002, the occupiers took over the t.v. stations and started continual broadcasts of pornography, with the sole t.v. station not so subverted assuring viewers that they did not support such actions.
It is alleged that the action was designed to keep young men off the streets.
And it had been reported by an Arabic newspaper that The Agency had advised to occupying force to take this action, 6 months prior to the incursion.
There’s an apocryphal anecdote, that Tesla actually assigned all his patents to George Westinghouse.
Then J.P. Morgan notified Westinghouse that, if he didn’t agree to sell out his interests, Morgan would crush him with lawyers—a tactic that is well-established in the early history of Rockefeller railcar oil transportation—if you sell out, you will get rich, if you resist, you will be crushed and get nothing, sign here and we’ll take the gun out of your mouth.
Westinghouse relented to Morgan, and GE was born, according to the lore.
Maybe the very late 1960s.
(The chemical structure of DOPE.)
Oh. So, that’s how it happened.
Rockerfeller lived as what he was, an extremely wealthy man with his only motive being to get richer. Human moralizers, need not apply. There are several billionaires like that today. Imagine, being wealthy enough to bully Westinghouse corporation with threats of Lawfare and endless legal expenses.
I’ve read a couple of books about Reich. One sympathetic and one critical. The Reich museum is in Rangeley, Maine at his former home and is open in the summer I think. I’ve been on the property but not when the museum is open. Always wanted to see a cloudbuster. Anyway, the fellow was a nutcase.
Well, if his doohickey caused 1mg of Radium to seriously sicken everybody around and kill all the mice, there must be something to it, even if he had it backwards.
I read his books while in college. Never gathered that he was a Marxist, and he broke with Freud, who was wrong about most things. He said the Marxists and Facists, who were supposed to be antagonistic, met up and merged in ideological specturm.
His books are fascinating, mostly.
I really liked Ellsworth’s Baker’s book, Man in the Trap.
I was reading about “buried emotions” causing aches and pains and conditions the other night and thought, yes, that is Reich, but mainsteam now.
Reich maintained that tension caused muscles to tighten and resulted in blockage of energy flows through the body with debilitating effects, and the relaxing of the tension has to be done slowly and cautiously in a patient.
I’ve built several of his blankets.
Sounds like some of those SNAKE OIL adds in the back of pulp magazines in the 1950s and 1960s.
I still dream of Orgonon
I wake up crying
You’re making rain
And you’re just in reach
When you and sleep escape me
You’re like my yo-yo that glowed in the dark
What made it special made it dangerous
So I bury it and forget
But every time it rains you’re here in my head
Like the Sun coming out
Ooh, I just know that something good is gonna happen
I don’t know when
But just saying it could even make it happen
On top of the world, looking over the edge
You could see them coming
You looked too small in their big black car
To be a threat to the men in the power
I hid my yo-yo in the garden
I can’t hide you from the government
Oh, God, Daddy, I won’t forget
— Kate Bush
https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/kate-bush-cloudbusting-wilhelm-reich-tragic-story/
Joe Taysom
@josephtaysom
Mon 1 February 2021 19:00, UK
Kate Bush is one of the finest songwriters, not just from her generation, but of all-time. Her ability to turn any theme or subject into a beautiful track is almost unparalleled, matched by her magnificent vocal range that is the definition of heavenly. The perfect example of her innate songwriting genius is ‘Cloudbusting’, an effort in which Bush created gold out of an utterly tragic tale.
‘Cloudbusting’ resulted from her inspiration to turn the real story from Peter Reich’s Book of Dreams into song. The book, released in 1973, tells the horrifying story of his father Wilhelm’s arrest for contempt of court. Wilhelm Reich was an Austrian psychiatrist who was trained in Vienna by Sigmund Freud; he was a pioneering figure in psychology, but, he was also a highly controversial figure who thought in a maverick type way.
The book was written from Peter Reich’s perspective and dealt with the human aspect of his father being treated as a threat to society by the state. His most notable work came during the 1930s when Reich came up with the seemingly bizarre concept of ‘orgone’. Reich stated this is physical energy that occurs during orgasm. He believed that the atmosphere contained this orgone energy, as did all living matter. To capture this energy, he then created the so-called, Cloudbuster.
According to Reich, this ‘orgone accumulator’ device could affect the orgone energy in the atmosphere, forcing clouds to form and create rain.
Reich’s story took a dark turn by the late 1940s through to the mid-1950s when the accumulators were the subject of an investigation by the American Food and Drug Administration for offering an unauthorised form of medical treatment. The administration then ordered him in 1954 to destroy all of the accumulators and burn all of his books that mentioned the devices. Without Reich’s knowledge, several machines made their way to New York. He was then fatally led to his trial for contempt of court after these machines showed up. Reich was then sentenced to serve two years in prison but, tragically, he passed away of a heart attack whilst in jail in 1957.
Bush explained how she stumbled upon the book in a 1985 interview: “I didn’t know anything about the writer. I just pulled it off the shelf, it looked interesting, and it was an incredible story. It’s written by Peter Reich, and it’s called A Book of Dreams. It’s about himself as a child, through his eyes as a child, looking at his father and their relationship. It’s incredibly beautiful, it’s very, very emotive, and very innocent because it’s through a child’s eyes.
“His father was a very respected psychoanalyst, and besides this, something that features in the book, he made machines called ‘cloudbusters’ that could make it rain, and him and his father used to go out together and make it rain; they used to go ‘cloudbusting.’ And, unfortunately, the peak in the book is where his father is arrested, taken away from him; he was considered a threat. So, suddenly, his father is gone, so it’s a very sad book as well.”
A few years later, Bush revealed the book’s human aspect made her connect with it and inspired her to write ‘Cloudbusting’. “All of us tend to live in our heads. In ‘Cloudbusting,’ the idea was of starting this song with a person waking up from this dream, ‘I wake up crying.’ It’s like setting a scene that immediately suggests to you that this person is no longer with someone they dearly love,” she explained to Associated Press in 1989. “It puts a pungent note on the song. Life is a loss, isn’t it? It’s learning to cope with loss. I think in a lot of ways, that’s what all of us have to cope with.”
Bush was anxious about how Peter Reich would feel towards the song and whether he would be disappointed with how she interpreted the book but, thankfully, he was gracious towards ‘Cloudbusting’. “He said he found them very emotional and that I’d captured the situation. This was the ultimate reward for me,” she recalled.
‘Cloudbusting’ is a masterclass in both storytelling and songwriting. Reich was a character that was vilified for his contentious work and would ultimately play a part in his death. Bush focused on the human side of the story and the impact of Peter Reich losing his father in such disputable circumstances at just 12-years-old. This song’s topic is an almost impossible one to pay justice to, but Bush has that ability to do things that other artists can’t, and ‘Cloudbusting’ is a pure example of this skill.
Bookmark. Thanks for posting this.
Thanks for the interesting read and poignant music video.
Orgone is pretty good on pizza. Give Reich that. Good enough that they named a state after it. We shouldn’t rewrite history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.