Posted on 06/10/2025 5:15:45 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
Nucor Corporation has announced a price increase for its hot-rolled coil (HRC) consumer spot price (CSP), marking a shift in the steel industry as new tariff policies begin to reshape market dynamics. Effective June 9th, 2025, Nucor has raised its CSP HRC base price to $890 per ton for all producing mills, with California Steel Industries (CSI) pricing set at $950 per ton. This represents a $20 per ton increase for all mills and a $40/ton increase for CSI from the previous week’s pricing of $870 per ton for standard mills and $910 per ton for CSI, signaling a potential reversal of the pricing stabilization seen in recent months. The move coincides with the implementation of 50% tariffs on steel imports under Section 232 trade policies, creating a protected environment for domestic producers to test price elasticity while foreign competitors grapple with higher trade barriers.
The latest Nucor price increase comes at a crucial juncture for the American steel industry, as manufacturers grapple with the implementation of enhanced Section 232 tariffs that have doubled to 50% on steel imports. This dramatic shift in trade policy has created a protective umbrella for domestic steel producers, potentially serving as a catalyst for mills to begin raising prices more aggressively after a period of relative stability in April and May 2025. The timing of Nucor’s price adjustment suggests that the company is positioning itself to capitalize on the reduced competitive pressure from foreign steel imports, which now face significantly higher barriers to entry into the U.S. market.
The magnitude of this week’s price adjustment is particularly noteworthy when viewed against the backdrop of Nucor’s recent pricing history. After implementing nine consecutive price increases from late 2024 through March 2025, the company had entered a period of price stabilization and even slight reductions in April and May 2025. The CSP had held steady at $930 per ton for three consecutive weeks in April before declining to $910 per ton in early May, representing the first decrease since July 2024. However, the current price increase to $890 per ton, while still below the March peak of $930 per ton, indicates that market conditions may be shifting once gain in favor of higher steel prices.
The 50% tariff implementation represents a doubling of the previous Section 232 steel tariffs, creating a level of protection for domestic steel producers. Some Industry analysts have noted that this tariff increase is expected to lead to “significantly higher prices for end consumers in the US market” and will fundamentally “shift trade flows” in the global steel industry. For Nucor, this policy change provides both opportunity and strategic leverage, as foreign competitors now face substantially higher costs when attempting to compete in the American market. The company’s decision to implement a price increase immediately following the tariff announcement demonstrates its recognition of the changed competitive landscape and its willingness to test the market’s acceptance of higher pricing levels.
Historical data reveals that tariff policies have consistently influenced Nucor’s pricing strategy. During the initial implementation of 25% tariffs in 2018 under Section 232, Nucor’s HRC prices increased by 38% over 18 months. The current doubling of tariffs creates a more pronounced protective effect, potentially enabling domestic mills to capture additional market share while maintaining price premiums. However, this strategy carries risks, as excessive price increases could incentivize downstream manufacturers to seek alternative solutions, accelerate offshore production of finished goods or at the very least pass on the increased pricing to its customers.
....
Nucor’s latest price increase marks a strategic inflection point in the post-tariff steel market. By leveraging enhanced trade protections while maintaining production flexibility, the company is positioning itself to capitalize on reduced import competition and stronger pricing power. However, this strategy requires careful balancing to avoid demand destruction in key end markets.
The historical price data demonstrates Nucor’s ability to lead market adjustments while maintaining profitability through operational efficiency. As the steel industry enters this new phase of protected competition, stakeholders must consider:
Long-term contracting strategies to mitigate price volatility
Hedging using hedging strategies to reduce risk in volatile pricing environments
Investment in domestic production capacity to improve U.S. domestic capacity and facilities.
With the 50% tariffs reshaping global trade flows, Nucor’s pricing decisions will serve as a bellwether for the broader industrial economy. The company’s next moves will test whether protected domestic markets can sustain higher prices without sacrificing growth in steel-intensive sectors.
I'm rolling my profits from US Steel (thank you, Nippon!) into Nucor and Steel Dynamics.
Unless I read this wrong, a domestic steel producer is raising prices due to tariffs on foreign produced product.
If I were Trump, I’d be really passed at Nucor - 50% is corporate greed at its worst!
I don’t think you miscomprehended.
The imported steel tariff is 50%...Nucor’s (& U.S. Steel too) price increases are more like 21% since July 2024. This is to be expected for all heavily tariffed products...the manufacturers have less competition on price.
https://steelindustry.news/uss-and-nucor-announce-price-increases/
In 1982, the Big 3 automakers begged Reagan for protection from small Japanese trucks (who were killing Detroit on this increasingly popular model). Reagan imposed import quotas which raised the price of these imports by an average of $500. The next day - yes, THE NEXT DAY, Detroit raised their list prices on their small trucks by $495.
Of course, our all tariffs/all the time simpletons don’t remember this obvious effect of tariffs - or being dishonest instead of just dumb, choose to forget it.
I’m f tariffs do not help raise domestic prices they are a failure. Most failing and non competitive companies are not profitable and need higher prices to stay in business and make a profit. In doing so they are able to invest in order to meet demand. This creates jobs and since the company is protected by tariffs they can be good paying jobs.
See how easy it is to tax ourselves into prosperity? Raise tariffs on a product until an American company can afford to make it and pay good wages and benefits. Tarifffs will make us rich. The treasury gets money to fund social welfare spending (73% of the budget), companies make money, and people get good jobs.
Companies can get greedy but we can have a price control board if Trump cannot keep them inline. If a tariff protected company needs lower raw material prices there can be exceptions. If the company cannot move their jobs they can be exempted. If the foreign producer is in an important allied country they can be helped as well as any critical comments for defense or movie producers.
Here’s what happens when little has changed in the amount of U.S. production of steel products and tariffs on imported steel products goes up, it’s exactly what happened when GWBush did it.
1. Domestic producers are given little incentive to invest in capital to expand how much they produce, because the total supply available to U.S. customers is going to shrink due to tariffs on imports - less total supply, same or greater demand, price goes up. Domestic producers do not have to increase production to increase revenue, they can get more revenue just by raising prices.
2. Small to median companies using steel items as raw material to their production, and who had been using U.S. steel products start to find themselves losing market share to foreign manufacturers whose finished goods had lower costs on the steel that went into them. One example: When G.W. Bush raised steel tariffs, one of the U.S. industries that lost market share to foreign manufacturers were U.S. makers of bicycles. Their costs on their raw materials - steel - had gone up but not so on their foreign competition. Imported bicycles. The issue is bigger than merely the industry the tariff is presumed to protect, because the impacts reach the industries being supplied by the industry being “protected” by the tariff.
Tariffs can and usually do fuel GREED.
In 1982, the Big 3 automakers begged Reagan for protection from small Japanese trucks (who were killing Detroit on this increasingly popular model). Reagan imposed import quotas which raised the price of these imports by an average of $500. The next day - yes, THE NEXT DAY, Detroit raised their list prices on their small trucks by $495.
Of course, our all tariffs/all the time simpletons don’t remember this obvious effect of tariffs - or being dishonest instead of just dumb, choose to forget it.
What happened was Toyota and Nissan built US assembly plants to make the same trucks that they were previously importing.
My long “understanding” of the difficulty of US automakers competing with the Japanese Koreans is that our legacy costs UAW contracts for wages, healthcare, retirement, corruption, etc., are enough more than the foreign carmakers that US has to cut corners on quality. Shoddier materials, slipshod corner cutting, less reliability and longevity, harder to repair, etc. in order to compete on sticker price.
Is there no way to cut that legacy price difference out so we could make better cars than the Japanese, etc.? Or is it much more to why their cars seem built better than that? If our carmakers in the US got the reward of the price difference being cut to the same, would they actually make better cars or squander it corruptly?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.