High dose radiation therapy, when one already has a limited spread, causes a substance to signal the other tumors to rapidly grow.
This seems to point to low dose radiation in this situation, no radiation, or the use of antibodies to block ampliregulin, if using high dose radiation.
To: Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; telescope115; ...
The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.
Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.
2 posted on
06/02/2025 9:40:51 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: ConservativeMind
3 posted on
06/02/2025 10:03:28 PM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: ConservativeMind
Why would this surprise them?
They keep warning us how bad radiation is and how much it causes cancer.
4 posted on
06/03/2025 12:24:08 AM PDT by
metmom
( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.”)
To: ConservativeMind
Could it be simply because killing tumors at one place increases nutrients for other tumors at different places?..............
5 posted on
06/03/2025 5:26:06 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: ConservativeMind
My wife is scheduled for a mastectomy next week. We’re praying that there’s no need for further treatment. If there is, radiation and chemo are last on our list.
she’s taking a hybrid approach. She’s been seeing a Naturopathic doctor in addition to the traditional types.
She’s on a whole slew of supplements and a relatively strict diet.
6 posted on
06/03/2025 5:26:34 AM PDT by
cyclotic
(Don’t be part of the problem. Be the entire problem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson