Rep. Anna Luna: 🚨 According to Douglas P. Horne, Frm. Assassinations Record Review, President Kennedy sustained multiple bullet wounds

John Wilkes Booth was witnessed by an entire audience. The shooter in Butler was caught in the act. All we were left with for Oswald are accusations treated as fact by those who have proven themselves to be liars. Sixty two years of hiding documents, losing evidence, avoiding questions, and deceiving the public tells my common sense that there is more to this story than a “lone assassin”. The government side is the only one forced upon us all these years. You can trust them if you want to. I don’t.

You have convinced yourself of something that is not true. Have fun with it. You think the CIA (or whoever) is all knowing and all powerful. Nothing could be further from the truth. The CIA couldn’t organize a panty raid let alone assassinating a president and covering it up.

But facts won’t change your mind.

”but facts won’t change your mind”

Assertions are not “facts”. The facts in this case are that assertions were made and much of the “evidence” supposedly backing those assertions has been lost, tampered with, or hidden from the public for sixty two years. These are facts, not assertions. Oswald was 24 years old yet somehow he managed to convince entire departments of our government to hide information about an act he is accused of for sixty two years. He must have been really powerful to have his “lone” act treated in such a manner even after his murder. Sorry, no one person has such power. That type of power exist only at the government level and we have seen it employed for sixty two years.

These are facts, not assertions. Oswald was 24 years old yet somehow he managed to convince entire departments of our government to hide information about an act he is accused of for sixty two years.

Dude… now you are going over the top. Oswald didn’t convince anyone to do anything. He was a commie nut case high school drop out who thought he was smarter than everyone else. What departments did he convince to do anything? When I said the government lies I meant it. The FBI should have been up Oswald’s butt with Kennedy in Dallas, but the weren’t. J Edgar had a story to tell about it, but the truth is they screwed up just like every other government agency.

You seem to want to blame the CIA for the whole thing. Like I said before, the freaking CIA couldn’t organize a panty raid. Whiteness the Bay of Pigs and various plots to kill Castro during the Kennedy administration. The CIA was a bunch of Ivy League f… ups. Did they lie?… always. Did anyone believe them then or now? No one with half a brain. But they could not cover up the assassination of a president. There are too many people watching and the stakes are far too high to get away with it.

You say a bunch of people saw Booth shot Lincoln. Actually no one saw him shoot Lincoln. The all saw him jump out of Lincoln’s box afterwards. Now I’ll tell you that Booth was just Patsy, and the US Army officer in the box with Lincoln actually did it. Prove me wrong. You can’t.

The crazy kid in Butler. Did he actually do the shooting? You didn’t see him do that. How do you know that some government agent didn’t put him up on that roof and then shot him dead so he could take the blame. You can’t prove any different.

I am convinced that Oswald did it because;
- He worked in the building that people heard the shots coming from and some saw the rifle barrel sticking out the window.
- The rifle found there was Oswald’s rifle
- Oswald left the building resulting in an all points bulliten being issued for him by the Dallas PD.
- When Dallas PD officer J. D. Tippet encountered Oswald on the street several miles away Oswald shot and killed him. Several people saw him do this and followed Oswald.
- Oswald ran into a movie theater (without buying a ticket) and the people following him directed the police into the theater. When confronted inside, Oswald attempted to shoot another officer who then subdued him.

Those are the facts. And you call Oswald a Patsy. Some patsy. But I don’t want to screw up you fantasy. Have fun dreaming about the all powerful CIA.

Once again you repeat the storyline given to us by those who MIGHT have had a vested interest in telling everyone it was a “lone nut”. The story tellers have had the luxury of not having to prove anything in a court of law. I haven’t accused anyone of anything. I have pointed out that whatever happened in Dallas that day is starting to stink, and we all smell it. By the way, that is a “fact”.

Once again you repeat the storyline given to us by those who MIGHT have had a vested interest in telling everyone it was a “lone nut”.

Once again, you don't know what the hell you are talking about. I was alive in 1963. I followed the news closely back then and what I am telling you now is what I saw and heard then. At first, everyone was blaming Texas conservatives. That was what the national news media was shouting. A few hours later, after people got to check Oswald's history, it turned out to be a Texas commie. I am not repeating anyone's story line… you are. You repeat the line that somehow the CIA did it. Other hustlers push the Mafia, Castro, The FBI, LBJ, George H.W. Bush, and who knows what other hustlers.

I recall one of them from my home town… Cyril Wecth. He claimed to be the best forensic pathologist ever… just ask him. He was the coroner for Allegheny county PA. He had no involvement with the Warren Commission but he started on the “Magic Bullet” theory and claimed it was impossible because that bullet showed no damage… he called it “pristine”. There is only one problem with that. The bullet was not pristine. Look at it from one side and it looked clean. But look at the other side or from the end and it was all bent out of shape. Did he know this… probably. Did he care… he'll no. He was selling books and getting invited on TV shows to spout his crap. He didn't give a crap about truth as long as he could suck cash from gullible people.

So who here is spouting storylines? You or me.

”I am not repeating anyones story line, you are”

I am simply pointing out the FACT that our government has taken sixty two YEARS to supposedly release documentation related to a crime that THEY have claimed was committed by a “lone nut”. You cannot deny this. In fact, your argument is centered on the “lone nut” theory. It took just a few hours to proclaim Oswald guilty but showing us their evidence to prove it has taken sixty two YEARS. Something doesn’t smell right to me while apparently, your nose is stopped up.

I am simply pointing out the FACT that our government has taken sixty two YEARS to supposedly release documentation related to a crime that THEY have claimed was committed by a “lone nut”. You cannot deny this. In fact, your argument is centered on the “lone nut” theory. It took just a few hours to proclaim Oswald guilty but showing us their evidence to prove it has taken sixty two YEARS.

No, it took more than a few hours to decide he acted alone. Many “reasonable” people at the time thought that the Soviets might be involved. I thought that was possible too. That took a while to iron out and was a big part of the Warren Commissions job. So again, you are spouting off about stuff you have no idea about.

The facts have not changed in 62 years. Oswald did it and he did it all by his f@#$ up self. That the government held information that could be embarrassing to some people or beyond any of our need to know has nothing to do with it. Most every murder investigation comes up with information that has nothing to do with the crime but can destroy the lives of innocent people. But you keep insisting there must be a cover up and will keep looking for one until the day you die. No one can change that. Have fun.