Posted on 05/24/2025 3:21:36 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna @RepLuna
🚨 According to Douglas P. Horne, Frm. Assassinations Record Review, President Kennedy sustained multiple bullet wounds, with photographic evidence to support this claim—evidence that was deliberately concealed and withheld from the official record.
"8 different sets of photographs are not in the official collection today, and never have been."
5:45 PM · May 21, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
I’m sick and tired of these various hustlers hawking BS crap on the internet that those oldsters among us know is total BS from the get go.
I was alive and following the news back then. I was not a big fan of Kennedy. But he was killed by a psycho commie nut case and it was far easier to kill him than it should have been. That’s the way it was in those days.
So you’re a Warren Commission believer aye?
I agree.
When I look at the supposed autopsy photo you don’t see the damage we all saw in the zapruder film
Precisely! There are way too many conspiracy theorists and people who like to twist the truth in order to make money.
As a matter of fact, I am. The Warren Commission wasn’t 100% perfect, but they got all the big parts right.
So I take it you are a follower of one of the book hustlers out there who have the Mafia, Castro, the CIA, the FBI, LBJ, Pappy Bush, or Space Aliens doing the deed. Which hustlers do you believe? There’s a lot of them to pick from.
The cop who was killed supposedly by LHO looked very much like JFK. It is why he was killed according to some sources.
Ditto, please explain why the CIA has withheld evidence for over 60 years if all we are dealing with is a lone gunman. Many have said that the Zapruder film has been altered. With today’s technology, this should be easy to prove. Why alter film of an assassination committed by a “lone” gunman? Shouldn’t we at least examine the Zapruder film?
The bullet wound to his throat was an entrance wound. It was about the size of a 30-30 wound. Exit wounds take mass quantities of flesh, entrance wounds leave neat holes.
Do you work for the CIA/FBI or something? Fools and Deep Staters think JFK was shot exclusively from the rear.
So you did the autopsy and know that was a 30 Cal entrance wound in his throat? Who told you that? With 10s of thousands of people working for the FBI and CIA right now, let alone how many have hundreds of thousands must have worked there in the last 62 years, it’s amazing that you could single me out. You are one hell of a slueth. Or maybe you are just another idiot who read a hustlers book and got suckered in.
Ever been to Dallas?
Can’t tell you what the CIA did or what they didn’t do Obviously they had Oswald on their lists of people to watch, and obviously they did a piss poor job of doing it. Same for the FBI. Typical f… up government bureaucrats. Would they lie about it afterwards? Hell yes.
That said, they did not get Oswald the job at the book depository,. The did not dictate that Kennedys motorcade would drive by that building. And they did not demand he be in an open top convertible.
I’d ask you to go to Dallas, visit that 6th floor museum, look out that window, and tell me you could not have made those shots. Most anyone could have, let alone a former marine who was crazy enough to do it. And a half hour later,he killed a Dallas cop, and then tried to kill another. Tell me what that has to do with the CIA.
I asked you about the Zapruder film potentially being altered. Shouldn’t we verify this or not?
I never heard of it being altered. If it was, what did they alter it to? It’s only a few seconds long, and other than seeing JFKs head exploding, does not have much detail. Keep in mind, it only 8mm taken from over 100 feet away.
I looked this up on the Zapruder film. This guy discusses the “altering”BS and considers it just that. More BS. But there are plenty of suckers out there who will buy most anything..
So you would have no problem having the original film inspected using today’s technology to put this argument to rest. If, as you imply, there is nothing to hide, this should be easy to confirm. An unaltered Zapruder film would quiet many speculations about government participation in the assassination. A Zapruder film that has been altered would confirm government participation. You’ve already admitted that you think we have been lied to by our government concerning this subject. How far do those lies stretch? Many of us want to know. Don’t you?
Again, I have no problem inspecting it. No problem at all. I just can’t understand what the government or anyone else would hope to accomplish by altering it. The film does not tell you who did what or why they did it.
As to the government lies, yes, they lie to us all the time, and they do it to cover their lazy, incompetent, corrupt bureaucratic asses. But have their lies made any difference in the Kennedy assassination, no, I don’t see that as a possibility. Far too many eyes on it and the stakes far too high for their normal lies to work.
People sit out here thinking the “government” is all knowing and all powerful and can make thing happen when ever they want. That’s pure Hollywood myth. The reality is they are a motley collection of f-ups looking to protect their own little fiefdoms. We saw that demonstrated time and again in the Biden administration where they lied about most everything and it was immediately obvious to anyone with a brain that they were lying. Without a corrupt media they could not have lasted 5 minutes.
I remember seeing that picture. My grandmother, not typically a reader of such things, bought this paper in the checkout aisle, because the article intrigued her.
My parents thought LBJ was behind the assassination.
My grandparents thought it was Cuba and the Mafia.
I have my own theory, which is much more sinister.
Telling us that the government did it is quite substantial in and of itself. Many of those responsible for hiding this truth from us all these years are still alive and deserve whatever justice is given to them. If,indeed, the story given to us is a lie, it is too big of one to ignore.
Have at it. Personally, I think you are barking up the wrong tree. Oswald killed Kennedy all by himself. It’s a sad commentary and one many people refuse to accept, but Oswald didn’t need any help whatsoever. It really was that easy. He hadn’t figured out what to do afterwards, but he was a nut case and not considering the consequences is what nut cases do. Same this past summer with Trump. That nut case in Butler damn near got Trump. I doubt he considered that he could be killed in making the attempt.
Upon what do you base your assertion that Oswald killed Kennedy? You seem firm on this belief. He did not have a trial where he could have proven himself innocent or the “patsy” he told the world he was. The only folks who told us Oswald did it and that he was a lone assassin are the same people that you claim lied to us. The point is where did the lies end. Some of us want to know.
How about John Wilkes Booth. He never had a trial either. Or that kid in Butler. He never had a trial. He was just laying on a roof getting a tan watching the festivities through a rifle scope when the Feds killed him for no reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.