Posted on 05/17/2025 3:20:44 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
Joe Rogan defended Kanye West’s latest song, titled “Heil Hitler,” on his podcast Tuesday and echoed the song’s antisemitic stereotypes.
West, who now goes by “Ye,” released the track last week, in which he sings the chorus, ““All my n—s Nazis, n—a, heil Hitler.” It’s the latest in Ye’s long stream of blatantly antisemitic comments and actions. Since its release, it has attracted both harsh criticism as well as some support from conspiracy-minded figures.
The chorus of praise also includes Rogan, one of the country’s most popular podcasters, who spoke up for the track’s music as well as its message. On Tuesday’s episode of the “Joe Rogan Experience,” he talked with comedian Tom Segura about the song, beginning his commentary by saying, “first of all, [it’s] kind of catchy.”
Regarding “Heil Hitler,” he added, “I don’t think it’s a good thing to say, I don’t say it. I certainly don’t think, I don’t think any racism is good. I don’t think antisemitism is good.”
Then he defended the song’s antisemitic message.
“If you ban it, then people want to hear it more, and then it becomes more popular, and then it kind of supports what he says, which is that there’s this concerted effort, if you talk about Jewish people, that they’re going to remove you from everything,” Rogan said. “Remove you from banking, which is what he’s saying. They run everything.”
Later in the episode, the pair discussed West’s diamond-encrusted swastika necklace. Earlier this year, the rapper sold swastika T-shirts on his site.”
“You know a Jew sold him that,” said Rogan of the necklace, to which Segura responded “probably.”
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
I’m on meal break and can’t listen, but just from what it seems Rogan said I can’t help but wonder if Ye is testing out the saying “ If you want to find out who the boss is, find out who you’re not allowed to criticize.”
I’m not talking about calling for violence on somebody but just criticism. The left calls for violence to Jews, and in their book that seems to be “free speech”. But if you criticize an actual Jew for something that has nothing to do with his ethnicity you’re very rapidly shut down in “polite society” for being “anti-semitic.” For example, anybody who speaks against what George Soros has done or is doing is automatically labeled as anti-semitic. That begs the question of who the media’s boss really is. Who the politicians’ and lawyers’ boss really is.
I’ll probably get into trouble for saying it but I wonder if the pro-Hamas people can get away with violent language when normal people dare not even make observations about individual Jews because the “bosses” of our world are in league with Hamas against a common enemy: the God of the Bible. Not the new age-ish atheist God of many Jews today, but the real God of the Bible. Almost like corrupt religion and corrupt government are beasts who serve the dragon (Satan).
The contradictions make sense when you see it through that lens.
And just to clarify, there are many Jews who love and trust the God of the Bible. I’m not talking about them. My argument is with Hamas and SOME Jews.
The Sodomite NAZIs only arrested other homosexuals who were detrimental to the movement or effeminate. NAZIs valued the masculine Greek Love concept. You really need to read the books, “The Pink Swastika”, and “The Poisoned Stream”, by Kevin Abrams and Scott Lively. They document decades of German writers exposing Germany’s National Sin (Sodomy) and the NAZI movement
Exactly, that’s just hypocritical!
Specious.
For a time, Ernst’s butt buddies were in charge of SA internal security. But after long-knives night, they were all rounded up, including Rohm himself.
There are some who maintain that Hitler was a rent-boy during his down-and-out years in Vienna.
IMHO, I don’t really care what the SA and the Nazis themselves were doing with their weinershnitzels. That was the least of their vices, but still a huge vice. Mass murder and another world war were the main problems.
Library of Congress grants the author numerous protections for 50 years. I’m a songwriter. I even made some money at it ;^). Ha-ha.
Sounded clear as a bell to me!
The Hitler quote is an excerpt from a speech which Hitler gave in the city of Essen in the year 1936 to an assembly of Krupp factory workers on the subject of a plebiscite (Volksabtimmung):
Ob Du meine Arbeit für richtig hältst, ob Du glaubst, dass ich fleißig gewesen bin, dass ich gearbeitet habe, dass ich mich in diesen Jahren für Dich eingesetzt habe, daß ich anständig meine Zeit verwendet habe im Dienste meines Volkes. Gib Du jetzt Deine Stimme ab, wenn Ja, dann tritt für mich ein, so wie ich für Dich eingetreten bin!You can view the corresponding clip of original British Pathé newreel footage here.
Regards,
I can’t remember but you got like 5 decades to hit it and get the hell out. Ask Keith Richards or John Rich. I don’t talk to my lawyers anymore.
Seriously? Did you try to get every single thing wrong? If so, good job.
What I don’t know is context. Basically, when I listened to the song I couldn’t make out the other words before the Hitler exerpt. Is Kayne saying that we ought to be like Hitler? That’s bad. Or is Kayne saying that today’s abortion in America or today’s Muslim attacks against Israel are too much like Hitler? If so, he did a good thing.
Before I join the boo chorus I want more info. To me it’s unreasonable to judge a man before we determine if the click bait media didn’t take him out of context like they did with Trump’s “fine people”.
Good for you! I was responding to Fiji Hill, who had said that, while he speaks German, he was having difficulty understanding Hitler's words.
What I don’t know is context. Basically, when I listened to the song I couldn’t make out the other words before the Hitler ex[c]erpt. Is Kayne saying that we ought to be like Hitler? That’s bad. Or is Kayne saying that today’s abortion in America or today’s Muslim attacks against Israel are too much like Hitler? If so, he did a good thing.
Sorry, I found Hitler's speech much more intelligible than Kanye's lyrics.
Regards,
50 years after the author’s death.
The song starts with Ye complaining about his divorce—and how he is not allowed to see his kids.
The rest of it is “black pill” stuff since he sees no positive way to remedy the situation.
If you hold my work to be correct, if you believe that I have been dilligent, that I have worked for you and dedicated myself to you in these years, that I have respectably used my time in the service of my people, now cast your vote, and if yes, stand up for me as I have stood up for you
As I wrote, I found the text of Hitler's speech more intelligible.
(I speak German. But I do not speak Jive.)
Regards,
“But I do not speak Jive”
Not even after Airplane and Airplane II?
Fought? The Nazis sterilized Afro-Germans, considering them to be subhuman. They also “euthanized” the mentally-ill in Aktion T4. Kanye would be luck to only be castrated under his beloved Nazis. This song is a call for a 72 hour psych hold
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.