Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DFG

The Hawker Hurricane was overall a better plane and more rugged.


8 posted on 05/08/2025 5:26:33 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dpetty121263
The Hawker Hurricane was overall a better plane and more rugged.

The homely Hurricane was also a more stable gun platform.

11 posted on 05/08/2025 5:41:41 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dpetty121263

60% of the Luftwaffe losses at the Battle of Britain were inflicted by Hawker Hurricanes. It just wasn’t as sexy as the Spitfire.


13 posted on 05/08/2025 5:49:52 AM PDT by Pythion.net
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dpetty121263

The Hawker Hurricane was overall a better plane and more rugged.


Especially with Polish pilots flying them.


39 posted on 05/08/2025 7:32:15 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dpetty121263
"The Hawker Hurricane was overall a better plane and more rugged."

I don't know from better but it was more important to the effort because it was cheaper to build so the slimey limeys built more of them. Plus it was a wooden airframe with a fabric skin, which was faster and cheaper to repair bullet holes in than a monocoque aluminum airframe. Which meant faster turn-around if/when they got shot up.

47 posted on 05/08/2025 8:39:24 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson