Posted on 05/04/2025 2:56:03 AM PDT by lowbridge
On July 7, 1962, Backberg, who was married and had two children, left her family’s home and headed for the woolen mill, where she worked, to pick up her paycheck, the advocacy group said. She never returned home, prompting her husband Ronald to reach out to his wife's relatives to inquire about her whereabouts.
Obviously I do not have the answer, but here are some possibilities:
Perhaps her sister lived at that address before she went missing? Or perhaps she had been with her sister since she went missing, because that is where she decided to go. She may have even been in contact with her family all along, and they all just kept up the ruse because the husband she left was actually that bad.
There is obviously a reason she did not want her story told, so we will most likely never learn the real story.
Good point. The video showing the brother meeting with Audrey, makes the case that none of the family has seen her for 62 years as the embrace looks authentic, not as if there is a ruse going on with the media and police.
It’s hard to figure given the limited information, but it looks like she left her husband and kids for whatever reason I’m sure she claims abuse they always do and my guess also is that she had some contact with her own family over the years, but the cops never knew what happened to her and that’s what this is really all about
I do find it odd she left her children with an abuser. Just an observation
And why I choose to go to Indianapolis from rural Wisconsin unless you know someone there
That’s right I’m the detective of lost souls and I’ll guarantee there’s more of the story
I do not put much faith in the answers returned by AI, because the answer is only as good as the data it has access to. I was also shocked by the supposed number of no body found cases that supposedly went to trial, especially since I asked for the number just in the U.S. 500 is kind of a too convenient round number which makes me suspicious at best. (86 * 5) would mean that 430 out of 500 were convicted.
Mainly because I had always heard that no body found cases were rarely brought to trial because the DA's were extremely reluctant to even try the case.
After all, all to often their careers are rated upon their conviction rate.
I was also suspicious of the claim that the very first case was brought in the late 1800's.
Lastly, because I didn't have much faith in the answer, I didn't even bother to click on the sources AI had used to return the answer that it did.
I find it good that 3 people at least were willing to speak out and question the results. Because my biggest concern regarding AI is people excepting the answer returned as being the gospel answer. For the answer needs to always be questioned. 🙂👍
And how it is programmed
And how it is programmed
By fellas with compassion and vision.
Not so much, anymore. :(
Yep, that too. 🙂👍
If there is a ruse then it would be entirely within the family itself, no involvement with the media or the police.
There is some reason why they requested that what she had talked about with the police not be shared.
What exactly that may be, I have no clue or guesses as to what that may be beyond continued fear of her ex.
Well, I am sure that happens more often than we may realize, Old water wells are another place where they have been found where determining foul play is far more difficult to conclude as the cause. An enclosed old septic tank kind of allows accidental falling in to be ruled out. 🙂👍
Depends, if ya kill ‘em and then cut ‘em up and flush ‘em, they’ll get there without a lot of excavation.
Too difficult to disappear today, and too easy to be tracked unluss you live in a cave somewhere.
If you use cash and live off the grid, there’s not much difference today than in the past.
Well, in my book that would be proof that it couldn’t have been an accidental death, because skeleton’s do not break up into small enough pieces that can be flushed down a toilet, can they? It might work to be unidentifiable in a city sewage system where the bone pieces might perhaps be rejected from entering into a sewage processing plant, but certainly not a closed septic system. In either case if the bones are found, accidental death could realistically be ruled out with confidence.🙂👍
Reminds me of this guy
Infamous Ohio bank robber who vanished 50 years ago ID’ed as dead man
On his deathbed, her father told her a secret: He was a fugitive and had robbed a bank in Ohio
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/03/us/thomas-randele-ted-conrad-bank-robber-confession-cec/index.html
When I would live on the road as a hitcher and drifter I had a personal rule of carrying nothing in my pockets, I carried no papers and no IDs or billfold, when I would start a journey I would make sure I had no money and would throw it away if there was any in my pockets, picking up money after the initial start I would keep, but not when I first would stick out my thumb on the Interstate to start the adventure.
It was incredible freedom, truly, “wherever you go, there you are”.
True, but is that even practical for most today? I argue that it isn’t. Sadly.
Yes, my parents had 4 under four and they hired a neghbor teen to help with the kids and the laundry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.