Skip to comments.
Counting Only Citizens: Restoring Fair Representation in America
AMUSE on X ^
| 26 Apr, 2025
| @amuse
Posted on 04/27/2025 8:41:26 AM PDT by MtnClimber
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: MtnClimber
If only this could get through the Senate filibuster process.
2
posted on
04/27/2025 8:41:37 AM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
None of my grandparents were citizens. Of course they should be and were counted. Go back to the earliest censuses...citizenship was never a requirement.
To: MtnClimber
...constitutional republic...Amuse understands while most politicians, not statesmen, don't.
4
posted on
04/27/2025 8:49:06 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: MtnClimber
It sounds like it would be a great court case, regarding how the census is conducted and the related reapportionment of Congress.
What would the results of such cases be?
I think we all know that liberal judges would take the position that all persons, whether they’re here legally or not, must be counted in the census, amd must be counted for congressional reapportionment.
To: MtnClimber
If only this could get through the Senate filibuster process.It only takes 51 votes to change the filibuster rules.
6
posted on
04/27/2025 8:49:51 AM PDT
by
FreeReign
To: MtnClimber
It wouldn’t matter.
Only takes 5 Special People on the “Supreme” Court to nullify it.
Democracy!
Pffft.
7
posted on
04/27/2025 8:50:49 AM PDT
by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: FreeReign
Realistically, there is a reluctance on the part of Republicans to change the filibuster rules.
And the reasoning is that, we would like the filibuster to still be a place the next time the Democrats control the Senate.
I know there are mixed opinions on this subject.
To: MtnClimber
And report every single NON-citizen to ICE.
9
posted on
04/27/2025 8:56:26 AM PDT
by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Realistically, there is a reluctance on the part of Republicans to change the filibuster rules. And the reasoning is that, we would like the filibuster to still be a place the next time the Democrats control the Senate. I know there are mixed opinions on this subject.The Democrats have now demonstrated that they will do everything in their power to stop the MAGA agenda.
Next time around, they will change the filibuster rule.
To: MtnClimber
Yet another legacy of slavery.
11
posted on
04/27/2025 9:05:44 AM PDT
by
glorgau
To: MtnClimber
If only this could get through the Senate filibuster process.
It can, if it becomes a campaign issue for 2026. Thaddeus Stevens proposed that congressional representation should be limited by the number of a state's citizens. The idea isn't new, but probably requires a constitutional amendment.
12
posted on
04/27/2025 9:06:26 AM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: ridesthemiles
13
posted on
04/27/2025 9:11:14 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again," )
To: MtnClimber
Former Congresswoman, Candice Miller, R-Michigan, talked about this years ago on the old Lou Dobbs Show.
14
posted on
04/27/2025 9:14:28 AM PDT
by
MachIV
To: Sacajaweau
None of my grandparents were citizens. Of course they should be and were counted. Go back to the earliest censuses...citizenship was never a requirement.
Right, slaves weren't citizens but were only counted as 3/5 of a person for purposes of congressional representation. The founders never considered illegal aliens citizens, since the Native Americans were specifically excluded for Congressional representation. Logically, illegal aliens are more analogous to non-citizen Native Americans than slaves. There is a very good argument that illegals should not count for representation in Congress even if it takes a Constitutional amendment to accomplish.
15
posted on
04/27/2025 9:33:52 AM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: MtnClimber
Non-citizens should not be counted
16
posted on
04/27/2025 10:07:44 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(A group of baboons is referred to as a "Congress" of baboons.)
To: stockpirate
Maybe a clarification...
Non-citizens could be counted. I have no issue with that. It could be useful information for certain interests.
That said, their numbers should NOT count towards Congressional Seat apportioning.
17
posted on
04/27/2025 10:30:48 AM PDT
by
John Milner
(Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
18
posted on
04/27/2025 1:37:43 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: MtnClimber
Married or Happy?
The Three Stooges ‘No Census, No Feeling’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kil2t20t18
Moe walks up a few steps to a door and says to a man who answered the door:
Good morning sir, I’m the census taker.
Are you married or happy?
A woman’s voice yells Henry!
The man ducks and Moe gets hit in the head from a flying vase.
Moe falls down the steps then writes down ‘married’
19
posted on
04/27/2025 1:44:40 PM PDT
by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: MtnClimber
Given the current landscape of judges, a constitutional amendment will likely be required.
20
posted on
04/27/2025 2:41:33 PM PDT
by
taxcontrol
(You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson