Posted on 04/24/2025 1:29:15 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Judge Colleen
Democrats go shopping for judges. Why can’t the DOJ sue a judge for overstepping jurisdiction and go judge shopping to have it enforced?
This is the mandate from US voters, I’m at a loss as to how these judges have standing to interfere.
Time to suspend habeas and start locking up some judges.
“Tried and tested system? Elections are a joke.”
Agree there. But the judiciary has been an oligarchical mockery for my entire long life. Back to Earl Warren who found all kinds of previously invisible rights for murderers.
It’s a requirement to vote...How the hell can you say....naw it’s okay...you don’t need to prove it. Just don’t lie...lol
No, this judge is saying that no laws apply any more.
Deep state stays one step ahead of us yet again. It’s quite obvious there is a coordinated effort to stymie Trump
The express train is only available to illegals represented by the ACLU. Everything else must go through the “process.” Cuck Roberts does not realize that Trump has put him on the wrong side of an 90/10 issue. Once people have had a belly full of court corruption Trump can use the illegal criminal issue to neuter the courts on many issues.
It’s time for a showdown. Who’s in charge a duly elected president or some unelected political hack rogue judges? Are we headed for martial law as the Supremes sit on their hands.
So the commies are finally admitting that illegal aliens DO vote in elections and that is the ONLY reason why they want illegals here..to vote Democrat and keep them in power forever..at least now they are admitting what we have all known for what, 20 yrs
If there is a federal law being broken, then only Congress members have standing. Congress is the only party with standing because the few federal election laws is their bailiwick. If state election laws are being broken, then that state’s legislature is the only party with standing. Not difficult to understand. There is no such thing as “taxpayer standing” in federal court unless there is concrete special and particularized harm to the Plaintiff taxpayer
Of course she did.DemocRats WANT non-citizens to vote. That’s what open borders was all about.
Even more ridiculous is the fact that we are now a country ruled by unelected judges, so what’s the point of having elections?
Injunctions are the new filibuster, aand so far they’ve been a lot more effective.
They will sink us with the wishy-washy Supreme Court.
Can the president or the Justice Department fast track an appeal, or is that the entirely the prerogative of the court?
Could we file for a change of venue at the time whenever the dems go to court?
Do we necessarily have to go to the next level to check such decisions? Could the administration or some other party file suit, citing some aspect, some piece of the injunction in a friendlier court in parallel to that court?
Lawyers out there? This is the field the dems have picked and they are going to win unless we come up with something new to counter them.
It is for Federal Elections...right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.