video above in post #24.
And what about the passenger's bodies still in their seats?
All secretly moved it? Before or after?
Posted on 04/21/2025 7:09:49 PM PDT by RandFan
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) suggested Monday that the US government may have played a role in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks during an interview with MAGA influencer Benny Johnson on The Benny Show.
The senator, who sits on the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, questioned the official explanation for the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 and echoed claims frequently raised by conspiracy theorists on the fringes of the internet.
“Within these agencies, a lot of them are going to cover their tracks and cover things up and destroy a lot of evidence,” the senator said. “It’s gonna be very frustrating for the American public because this is their information. They deserve the truth. It’s been hidden from them way too long.”
Sen. Johnson praised Benny Johnson for “opening up the aperture on 9/11” and referenced firefighters’ statements about the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
“I know you and I are both considered conspiracy theorists,” Johnson said, “but that’s exactly how they keep this stuff covered up.”
The two also discussed the possibility of Congressional hearings into the 9/11 attacks. When asked what he wanted to know, Sen. Johnson focused on Building 7 – which conspiracy theorists have claimed went down in a controlled demolition
“Start with Building 7,” he said. “I don’t know if you can find structural engineers other than the ones that had the corrupt investigation inside NIST that would say that thing didn’t come down in any other way than a controlled demolition.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
I dont have the blue prints of the site, but the amount of weight falling straight down, twice(2 towers) im sure would have the same effect on the surrounding underground foundations as kicking off a leg of a chair.
Where did you see that video? It was a plane.
Still a lone gunma from the book depository believer? That’s okay. I think they’re serving fish sticks and lime jello for lunch in the cafeteria today.
It certainly may be a possibility. I don’t know if the structures were built to be earthquake resistant or not, but if they were then it becomes less plausible, one would assume at any rate. I would be interested in knowing if the collapses registered on Richter Scales, and if so what the magnitude registered was.
I agree. But massive structural damage, no sprinklers, 7 hours of uncontrolled fire and an ever-worsening bulge can.
Plus there was no plane down at the site in PA.
What was at the site?
Plus the Pentagon was hit by a strategic strike from a missile, not a plane.
How did the "missile" knock down the street lights on the nearby road?
Was the "missile" carrying passenger bodies, luggage and airplane seats? Or were those things already hidden inside the Pentagon before the attack?
Never has and never will.
A flattened area with a little stray debris.
Junk was clearly put in place, such as on the streets by the NYC towers. Have you watched the video of the Pentagon hit? Seen the hole it created?
Are you just a troll?
Yes. Have you seen one that shows a missile?
Were the drivers on the nearby road who saw a passenger jet fly over them all in on it?
Seen the hole it created?
Yes. What does the size of the hole indicate to you?
Are you just a troll?
Are you just a loon?
When you NEVER get the WHOLE truth, one starts to question what is the truth.
Putting this debate aside.
I will NEVER believe that the Saudis didn’t know MORE than they said they knew.
The gubmint still has NOT come up with credible information on the Anthrax stuff.
There is NO logical explanation of Osama bin Laden hiding in plain sight at the behest of one our “allies” which is a figurative indictment of the Bush/Cheney crime families.
The fact that Obama bin Laden and Biden get credit for taking out Osama bin Laden is a treacherous DISGRACE to the entire GOPe and the Republican wing of the uniparty.
And when one returns to the PRESENT TIME, Americans still have NO credible evidence of who that 20 year old dietary assistant at nursing home was who the gubmint would have us believe was a crazed lone assassin.
I don’t want to question the gubmint’s 9/11 narrative for no other reason than it makes me appear to be on the same side of an issue as Rosie O’Donnell and all the left-wing loonies.
I have NO doubt Trump would like to get to the truth on all things.
But the Deep State is a colossal onion and there are just so many layers to peel back to even get a glimpse of the truth.
Rows of seats with bodies were put in place? Before or after?
Were all the "passengers" faked? Or were they killed somewhere else and later "recovered" from the Pentagon?
How many people were in on it? Hundreds? Thousands?
You have no clue (or you’re trolling). Go look at any of the good films out there with original footage.
Jeesh!
And what about the passenger's bodies still in their seats?
All secretly moved it? Before or after?
No passengers buddies or seats there, pal.
I was supposed to be teaching a secure networking class at the Pentagon on 9-11... but we were putting the finishing touches on some war-planning/fighting software programs, so they sent another in my place - he was stuck for 2 weeks before they allowed him to rent a car to return to base - it was a plane - he saw some of the wreckage.
Come out of the wilderness once in a while and you may run into folks with first-hand experience - or who have access to trusted folks who have first-hand experience.
I have a feeling my 24 years in uniform and another 15 teaching those in uniform things you would never be allowed to see, trumps your “I wanna believe something else” mentality - enjoy your jello and fish sticks - I hear they used real Cod today.
Link?
video above in post #24.
And what about the passenger's bodies still in their seats?
All secretly moved it? Before or after?
So much faked evidence on that day...
Being a swamp rat, you are the last person I would believe about anything.
I recall reading about building 7 back in the day.
I don’t recall all the details, but I do remember my conclusion, which was that all the evidence suggested a controlled demolition. No other evidence of why it could have collapsed.
But of course we can’t have an intelligent discussion about it.
Re: 57 - but what about that specific photo?
Can you point to SPECIFIC signs that it is fake?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.