Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

So William Shatner’s trip didn’t apply? I’m fairly sure his wasn’t the Kubrick show we just saw with six women. Perhaps that’s “sub-orbital” height.


2 posted on 04/20/2025 7:04:02 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Momma talkin' to me tryna tell me how to live...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MikelTackNailer

What Shatner did was the same thing suborbital they didn’t actually go into space


4 posted on 04/20/2025 7:07:05 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikelTackNailer
So William Shatner’s trip didn’t apply?

No, it didn't - insofar as Shatner is not an astronaut.

He was a passenger - rating barely higher than ballast.

The term "astronaut" is defined as: Someone who has completed the requisite (rigorous) training.

Shatner was probably instructed about how to extinguish his cigarette when the warning display lit up, etc. - but did not undergo the prescribed (grueling) course of training to become an astronaut.

Regards,

13 posted on 04/21/2025 1:08:46 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson