Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/18/2025 7:39:51 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marcusmaximus

Which was 0bummer’s stupid deal.


2 posted on 04/18/2025 7:40:37 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (My Bearded Lady neighbor is an "Intimacy Coach" from the shed w/ Palestinian & Gay flags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus
Trump shouldn't agree to any deal unless the mosques in Iran play 5 times daily Rock the Casbah by The Clash.
3 posted on 04/18/2025 7:43:51 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

Now that they have enough to create a few bombs, they are willing to reduce production. I think that train has left the station.


5 posted on 04/18/2025 7:45:39 AM PDT by Mlheureux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

As the article admits, until the enrichment is >90% it can’t go boom.
So, why are we wasting any effort or negotiating capital on anything below that? What are we giving up that we could have if we quit talking about anything below 90%? This is asinine.

Apparently, there is money involved in wasting such effort. So, who is profiting?


6 posted on 04/18/2025 7:45:43 AM PDT by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

How much do you trust the UN IAEA?


7 posted on 04/18/2025 7:47:07 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

The ONLY military threats to Iran, are from the one nation whose very existence the Mullahs threaten to eliminate - Israel. Minus the ability to make good on that threat, the Mullahs have no security needs for which to pursue nuclear weapons. An Iran that was minus the Mullahs would be neither a threat to, nor threatened by, anyone.


10 posted on 04/18/2025 7:53:39 AM PDT by Wuli (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

Perhaps Trump is buying to time to let things play out behind the scenes. The Rial is worthless. It’s over 1,000,000 rial to a $. The IRG isn’t getting paid. Iran has lost Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah, and soon the Houthis. The mullahs are on borrowed time.


11 posted on 04/18/2025 7:53:53 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (Long live The Great MAGA Kangz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

In the final stage, the report said, Iran would transfer stockpiles of highly enriched uranium to a third country, the US Congress would ratify the nuclear deal, and the Trump administration would lift primary and secondary sanctions.

Now just who would be the third party ??


12 posted on 04/18/2025 7:55:36 AM PDT by tet68 ("We would not die in that man's company that fears his fellowship to die with us." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus
This plus supposedly blocking an Israeli attack on Iran's nuke facilities sure looks like Trump is backing down.

His feckless weakness over Ukraine is apparently being joined with caving in to the mullahs as well.

On foreign policy at least, we're getting Donald "J is for Jimmy Carter" Trump.

15 posted on 04/18/2025 8:03:56 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

Naw.

Iran needs to do better than the 2015 deal. They have to go be guarantees of non-terrorism support and non-piracy. So, no Hezbolla, Al Quesda, Hamas, Houthis, or any other Islamic terrorist organization. Should they violate it, they accept unrestricted warfare and its consequences to Iran and its people.

The will say ‘no’ and then Trump will have said he tried negotiations and they failed. Takes longer, ends same way.


17 posted on 04/18/2025 8:07:49 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

An agreement structured around an “enrichment cap” would be a relic of the misguided Obama-era mindset. If America embraces such a naïve proposition, we won’t just be compromising our strength — we’ll be signaling to the world that we’ve chosen the path of “peace through weakness”.


18 posted on 04/18/2025 8:33:29 AM PDT by USA-FRANCE (The Iran-Russia-North Korea-China Axis is at war against Israel and Ukraine. Let's not forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

anyone interested in this subject should look up the words ...

separative work unit

concerns the enrichment of uranium.
most of the work to get to 90 is done by the time
you get to 3.5


19 posted on 04/18/2025 8:51:17 AM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marcusmaximus

Reagan, “The bombing starts in ten minutes.”


24 posted on 04/18/2025 9:21:19 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson