Posted on 04/16/2025 9:23:03 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
Since the Journal is taking on the world's wealthiest client, I'm pretty sure that the story is bulletproof against defamation.
Far out… yeahhhhh
Would Elon say he is secretly paying women to have his children?
Does the WSJ think their readers are stupid enough to buy this?
Sounds like the WSJ is being pushed out into the open by its deep-state masters.
The story is based on the claims of a “baby momma” whose child Musk disputes the paternity of.
And then some internet “influencer” - who claims to have rec’d a message from Musk, among her many followers.
Sounds like WSJ is being forced to go full CNN
Now somebody do a “shock expose” on the open borders supporting WSJ.
Wouldn’t there be screenshots of all of this activity that could be released? Elon is definitely a hound, but I doubt there’s anything going on at the level the WSJ is communicating.
it’s “bulletproof” only because the WSJ used the words “alleged” and “allegedly” about a thousand times ...
IOW, WSJ is publishing rumors ...
As long as you buy this crappola, your question is answered. Like the NYTimes, a rag.
I think Dana wants the same from him. This is her entre in order to obtain the opportunity to meet him in order to hammer out the details. 🤣
This is 15 days too late (for April Fools).
One should never go full CNN...lol.
Gah. For a smart guy he sure ignores the total necessity of a living involved day to day father in the home.
Poor kids.
Word on the street in Austin is that the number of children is in the triple digits.
That’s one of the stupidest things I’ve read yet from WSJ.
His latest conquest, the Fox news reader (I’m not looking up her name right now) specifically went after him with the plan to get pregnant. She made no secret about it at the time.
And Musk has made no secret about the fact that he wants more children. He has no problem supporting them and volunteers to do so as long as it is proven the child is his.
If my WSJ subscription wasn’t free, I’d cancel it.
Such a silly notion. At the end of the day WE ALL PAY.
Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, and the Wall Street Journal aren’t pimply college freshman posting blogs in the moms’ basements.
If the story wasn’t accurate, The WORLD’S RICHEST MAN would have no problem hiring an army of lawyers to establish that this story is defamatory slander. All the “allegeds” and “allegedlys” in the world wouldn’t change that.
Hmm. On a moral level, his behavior bothers me. But on a practical level...
Who would I rather see having lots of children? A proven brilliant and rich man and his harem of provably above-average women, or some stupid violent crack-head and his harem of welfare-dependent ghettopotami baby-mommas?
Seriously, does the WSJ expect us to care? Consenting adults can do whatever they please and it’s not like Musk is going to be asking for my tax dollars to support his kids. What happened to the Wall Street Journal - at one time it was a respected news source.
Soon they will be saying Elon is fornicating his way for an army of 144,000!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.