it’s “bulletproof” only because the WSJ used the words “alleged” and “allegedly” about a thousand times ...
IOW, WSJ is publishing rumors ...
Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, and the Wall Street Journal aren’t pimply college freshman posting blogs in the moms’ basements.
If the story wasn’t accurate, The WORLD’S RICHEST MAN would have no problem hiring an army of lawyers to establish that this story is defamatory slander. All the “allegeds” and “allegedlys” in the world wouldn’t change that.
I reckon trash like this is why trust in the media is at an all time low.