[Robwin]

More hysterics from the Left. Hard to believe "69 million" marrried women don't have IDs which don't match their married names. 69 million, huh? Well, ok, if MSNBC says so, 'cause if you can't trust MSNBC whom can you trust.

[cgbg]

The Democrats seem to think their voters are rock stupid.

They may have a point.

Lol.

[SeekAndFind]

OK, while we’re at it, let’s also NOT require ID for receiving welfare, medical care and social security, after all it’s discrimination against women’s rights to require it.

[MortMan]

“The House just passed the Republican voter suppression measure that threatens voting access for millions of Americans, including 69 million women whose married names don’t match their birth certificates,” Hillary Clinton noted on X.

On;y if they never registered their marriage and name change.

[Macoozie]

We have nothing to learn from someone named Ja’han.

[Toddsterpatriot]

And critics have also said the law runs the risk of disenfranchising women who marry and then change their last name.

If the stupid ones are disenfranchised, I can live with that.

[FlingWingFlyer]

This from the scum that wants girls to compete against men in sports. Don’t you have a “John” waiting for you somewhere Ja’han?

[BenLurkin]

Nope. No bias in that headline. None at all.

[FatherofFive]

So, women are stoopid?

[j.havenfarm]

You have to hand it to them: absolutely lacking the slightest integrity, they can instantly come up with a fresh lie to apply to whatever their chosen issue is. The media, having taken a 2X4 to the teeth, have decided that reform of how they cover news to be honest is too hard and/or politically unpalatable. So they’ve decided they’re just going to continue as the media organ for the left

[Zathras]

“Women and minorities hardest hit”
Sure wish they would get their talking points correct.

[Organic Panic]

Tell us how stupid democrat voters are without telling us how stupid they are....

[exDemMom]

Considering that married women are more likely to vote conservative, I’d think the left would be thrilled if this were true.

What a shame there is no documentation available to show when women change their name through marriage. /s

[AZJeep]

These scary scenarios are what Dems are all about.
Require proof of citizenship = disenfranchising 70 millions of women.
Stopping social security fraud = cutting SS benefits.
Making corporate taxes matching the world ones = unfair benefits for the rich.
Getting rid of USAID = letting world starve.
Getting rid of DOEd = destroying Education.
Deporting terrorists = destroying US agriculture
Trying to match tariffs to what other are charging us = depression.
Stopping climate Hoax = destroying Earth.
Destroying democracy

Etc. Etc.

They are really creative in these hoaxes.
When will people learn?

[McGavin999]

If you are married you have a marriage certificate that has your maiden name on it.

[dagunk]

Well, ok, if MSNBC says so, ‘cause if you can’t trust MSNBC whom can you trust.

*******************************************

Hey.....

“Well, if you can’t believe what you read in a comic book, what *can* you believe?!”
— Bullwinkle J. Moose [Jay Ward]

[Linda Frances]

The women on the left insult their female base telling them they’re stupid. They’re right. They also think minorities are ignorant. They should look in the mirror.

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

I saw that this allegation was all over the Left media, and believed as gospel, yesterday and I wondered where it came from. Now I know: from that good old sewage discharge pipe herself, HRC.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Many a woman named Gurbozakiwicz wholehearted welcomed changing
her name to Mrs. Smith. No fuss. No muss. A right of passage.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Yep. Because, ‘She Who Shall Not Be Named’ is an EXPERT on marriage. *SNORT*

[rolling_stone]

i guess they didnt watch the recent press conference that addressed this lie....