https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12951-019-0454-6
That’s exactly what I’ve been trying to tell everybody. But do they listen? No!
bttt
You can already get hydroxyapatite toothpaste. Most famous is Apagard from Japan. There is also Pearlie White from Singapore. Both are available on Amazon, and Pearlie White seems to me to be a better bargain, but I have no data to support that.
fluorite compounds such as sodium fluorite are absorbed only by the surface of the teeth, so it’s unnecessary and perhaps even foolish to consume such compounds for systemic distribution ... all that’s necessary too toughen tooth enamel is to use a mouthwash or toothpaste that contains sodium fluorite, and spit them out rather than swallow them after you’re done ...
Is this one group of industrial chemists communicating with other groups of industrial chemists? To whom are they directly speaking? Students, perhaps? This is either AI, or a portion of a seminar. Definitely not a dialog.
Interesting.
I make my own toothpaste, HA is an ingredient.
About 1/4 cup in the mix that gets used over 2 months or so.
I think I’m ok but will be aware of ingesting any.
Cool article, thanks for posting.
Note the study fed high amounts of it.
Brushing your teeth with it, which you dont then go and swallow it, is not being fed high amounts of it. Plus factor in we are 100-200 times the weight of rats.
Tnis stuff is in general, safe and great for tooth repair and reversing micro cracks in enamel, incorporating into the teeth and becoming teeth. It strengthens your teeth.
You dont eat it in large amounts.
The EU has said nano-hydroxyapatite is safe if it is rod shaped, which is what many of these toothpastes use.
One I use is Davids Hydroxi Fluoride Free Nano Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste for Remineralizing Enamel.
The EU information approving this is here:
https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/hydroxyapatite-nano-0_en
Bkmk
And are we trying to force Europe to import it from us?
Just took a quick cruise through some recent papers.
Looks like genotoxicity and cytotoxicity are still issues.
And the one paper that asserted that it wasn’t used the words “most of the studies”.
Okaaaay...
We don’t whine about flouride any more.
We’ve got the jab to whine about....... much better