here is an internet poster breakdown of it:
Document type: FBIS (Foreign Broadcast Information Service) report
Classification: UNCLAS (Unclassified)
Serial: AU3003152893
Country: Russia International
Subject: Paper reports alleged evidence on mishap involving UFO
Source: Kiev Holos Ukrayiny in Ukrainian, 27 Mar 93, p. 5
Summary of the report:
The text is a reprint from the newspaper “Ternopil Vechirniy” titled “Cosmic Revenge”
After Mikhail Gorbachev dissolved the KGB in 1991, secret materials were obtained by the CIA
U.S. intelligence allegedly acquired a 250-page file about a UFO attack on a military unit in Siberia
The file reportedly contains photos, drawings, and testimonies from participants
A CIA representative described it as “a horrific picture of revenge on the part of extraterrestrial creatures”
A low-flying saucer-shaped UFO was shot down by a surface-to-air missile
Five short humanoids with large heads and black eyes emerged from the crashed UFO
The aliens reportedly merged into a single object that grew, turned white, and exploded
This explosion allegedly turned 23 watching soldiers into “stone poles,” with only two soldiers in the shade surviving
The KGB report claims the remains were taken to a secret research facility near Moscow
Scientists speculate an unknown energy source changed the molecular structure of the soldiers’ bodies
A CIA representative stated that if true, this shows aliens possess technology beyond human assumptions
Additional context:
This document appears to be an intelligence report translating and summarizing a Ukrainian newspaper article
The report is dated March 27, 1993, suggesting it was created shortly after the alleged newspaper publication
The document is marked as “Approved for Release,” indicating it was declassified at some point
Despite being an official document, it’s important to note that it’s reporting on unverified claims from a newspaper article, not presenting confirmed intelligence findings
The sensational nature of the claims and the lack of verifiable evidence suggest this should be treated with significant skepticism