Tucker Carlson Horrified as Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Drops Chilling COVID Statistic [C19 'vaccine']

thegatewaypundit.com ^ | April 3, 2025 | Vigilant Fox

[ransomnote]

SNIP

Instead, they pushed forward, adding the COVID vaccine to the routine childhood schedule, with the expectation that babies receive three doses by just nine months of age.

She added that the shots are still under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children under 12—not fully FDA approved—and yet they remain on the official vaccine schedule.

Tucker was horrified when Dr. Bowden mentioned a disturbing fact: “According to the CDC, 9 million American children have gotten the latest version of these COVID shots,” she said.

Clearly caught off guard, Carlson asked, “Actually?”

“Yes,” Bowden confirmed.

“Still?” he pressed.

“Yes. Yes. 9 million [kids]—12% [of US children have been injected].”

[ransomnote]

Children are still being given the Covid19 'vaccine'. It was placed on the childhood vaccine schedule so that babies have 3 doses by the age of 9 months!

Normally the pharmas rush to get their vaccines on the childhood schedule because once it's on the schedule, the pharmas are free from product liability.

But apparently the Covid19 'vax' pharmas are extra cautious for this 'vaccine'. Instead of putting the licensed version of the C19 'vaccine' on the childhood schedule, they put the Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) version of the 'vaccine' on the childhood schedule. I think the EUA has ended so I don't understand why anyone is administering the EUA version, except that for pharmas, an EUA version of a vaccine does not incur product liability, whereas once their product is licensed, the company becomes liable for it should vaccine harm result.

When some members of the public (and military) were refusing the C19 'vaccine' (gene therapy shot) on the grounds that it was experimental, the FDA and pharmas pushed through a licensed version of the vax. Then the gov and employers said, 'well now there's no excuse not to get the vax...'. However, the pharmas kept distributing the EUA version without telling the public. Bait and switch - those refusing the experimental vax and then forced to get it because it was supposedly licensed, were still given the experimental version of the vax because the EUA version freed the pharmas from liability.

Regarding the continued injection of babies/children, it really looks like the pharmas want to be twice removed from liability by a) having the C19 gene therapy shot on the childhood schedule for vaccinations and b) administering the EUA version.

Crimes against humanity.

[Jane Long]

Thank you for posting this.

Dr Bowden has been put through H3LL by Methodist Houston hospital.

They took away her hospital privileges when she refused to stop treating her sick patients with Ivermectin. She was saving lives, and, they couldn’t have that.

They also sent the Tex Med Board after her.

She courageously stood up to them and it all. God bless her.

[ransomnote]

PING

They are still administering the EUA version of the ‘vaccine’ to children; 12% have been injected.

[Veto!]

Unbelievable horror.

Every young parent in the US should be told not to give their precious babies poison. JUST SAY NO.

[Jan_Sobieski]

In the future, few Americans will live to 65. This is a planned reduction in underfunded liabilities.

[Darksheare]

Ib4tg and Ib4jab pushers

[Jane Long]

IB4DaisyDukes.

[airborne]

Because abortion isn’t killing kids fast enough for the liberals.

[SaveFerris]

The COVID-19(84) cult was really something else

Every day at work in 2021-2022

NO NO NO

I’m not taking the jab(s)

STOP ASKING

[SaveFerris]

(Because abortion isn’t killing kids fast enough for the liberals.)

safe AND effective...

...Population Reduction

[Twotone]

I’m surprised RFK hasn’t pulled all childhood vaccinations already. They’ve never been tested on young children. This should be stopped immediately.

[TexasGator]

“they put the Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) version of the ‘vaccine’ on the childhood schedule.”

They are using fully approved formulas. Fully approved for 18 and older.

[stanne]

“ They are using fully approved formulas. Fully approved for 18 and older.
”

There is no such thing

[Darksheare]

My job started threatening us, and they got heavy pushback.
They then very quietly and sheepishly said “nevermind”.

[TexasGator]

“There is no such thing”

Yes there is.

[ransomnote]

'Approved' is not the same as 'licensed'. Below is evidence which shows the EUA version of the Covid 'vaccine' is still being administered even though there is a licensed version. The difference is that the EUA version is free of liability, unlike the licensed version. They are deceiving the public.

~~~
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-2024-2025

Food and Drug Administration (.gov)

https://www.fda.gov › emergency-preparedness-and-response › coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19 › covid-19-vaccines-2024-2025

COVID-19 Vaccines for 2024-2025 | FDA

The FDA has approved and authorized for emergency use updated COVID-19 vaccines (2024-2025 formula) that include a monovalent (single) component that corresponds to the omicron variant KP.2 strain ...

• Approves and Authorizes
• Covid-19 Vaccines

[TurkeyLurkey]

Yes it is crimes against humanity.
It breaks my heart that some family members don’t believe the truth about the Covid vaccines, but we keep telling them. Thanks for this, and praying for our family members and many others, that they would change their minds, see the truth, protect their families and tell others.

[Political Junkie Too]

Nine month olds can give informed consent for emergency use?

-PJ

[doc maverick]

If you don’t go along with this bioweapon, you are forced to resign your hospital position. That is why I work at a private clinic now. This is a continuing crime against humanity with many evil players reaping the profits and intended outcomes.

[ransomnote]

THe CDC is distributing Emergency Use Authorized versions of all Covid19 'vaccines' when licensed versions are available, and the Covid 'emergency' status was terminated in 2023. The only known reason for this bait-and-switch is that licensed versions entail liability and EUA versions do not. Their excuses and rationalizations for distributing EUA 'vaccines' after the Covid 'emergency' was terminated in 2023 is on the following page:

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/faqs-what-happens-euas-when-public-health-emergency-ends

At the start of the Plandemic, a requirement of an EUA for the Covid 'vaccines' was the fact that an emergency existed. It looks like HHS amended this requirement in 2023 to include the 'potential for an emergency'. Those monsters!

On March 17, 2023, HHS issued a notice that, effective March 15, 2023, the HHS Secretary amended the February 4, 2020 determination made pursuant to section 564 of the FD&C Act and determined pursuant to his authority under section 564(b)(1)(C) that there is a public health emergency, or a significant potential for a public health emergency, that affects, or has a significant potential to affect, national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad and that involves a biological agent, namely the novel (new) coronavirus (nCoV) first detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China in 2019 (SARS-CoV-2). 

For the record, Covid 19 was never a 'novel' (new) corona virus.