Sounds painful.
But at least they are starting to admit it wasn’t safe or effective.
The Wuhu Flu and vaccine-the gifts that keep on giving.
I know it does. My wife just died of pancreatic cancer!
I have been i=seriously ill after the two deadly shots!
It’s not surprising that I despise the dwarf Fauci and the imbecile Biden.
A wall and high velocity lead therapy.
PING
There’s no disease the vaxx can’t give you!
Thanks, CondolezzaProtege.
Hey Dorkwad.
Over here!
My mother was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 1\2021; died 3\2021. Was vaxxed in 2020. 😠
.
Here’s another article that’s easy to understand about the covid virus spike proteins and how the jabs are having exactly the same effects:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14547483/tucker-carlson-stunned-doctor-america-cancer-pandemic.html
How come my 100-year-old grandmother has had every COVID vaccine her assisted living home can get with no problems? She is very popular in her place and knows about those having health problems. I ask her if she knows of anyone having problems with the vaccine. She has heard nothing and that was the since the three years when I began asking.
I think the case of vaccine illness are the result of the fallacy of composition. This is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. A trivial example might be: “This tire is made of rubber; therefore, the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber.” This is fallacious, because vehicles are made with a variety of parts, most of which are not made of rubber. The fallacy of composition can apply even when a fact is true of every proper part of a greater entity, though. A more complicated example might be: “No atoms are alive. Therefore, nothing made of atoms is alive.” This is a statement most people would consider incorrect, due to emergence, where the whole possesses properties not present in any of the parts. Thus, a illness from a vaccine is the result of many with the same illness is the logic of the composition fallacy.
1) This is not peer-reviewed, nor is it a study.
2) Any reaction to the vaccine is caused far more severely and frequently by the pathogen that the vaccine targets. Another way of saying this is that if a virus causes a particular type of event, there is an extremely low chance that the vaccine against the virus will also cause the event. This review (not study) does point out that several different viral infections are associated with pancreatitis.
3) There was no discussion of the actual incidence rate of pancreatitis following vaccination (or following Covid-19). When assessing relative risks, this kind of information is critical. They only found 64 reports to include in the review, but do not say how many they determined were actually pancreatitis occurring within a short time after receiving a vaccination. Still, if we assume that all 64 reports were temporally linked to the vaccine, we’re looking at just 64 incidents among billions who have been vaccinated. And a temporal link alone does not prove anything. In any given population, there is always a certain chance that an adverse event will happen. The pertinent question, left unanswered, is whether there is more pancreatitis among people who have recently received a vaccine as compared to those who haven’t.
4) Most of the review focused on symptoms and treatment of pancreatitis. Although they kept mentioning vaccination as a potential cause, there was no actual examination or discussion of the mechanism.
5) You still have a 1% chance of dying if you catch Covid and a fairly high chance of developing long Covid if you don’t die. The long term effects of surviving a Covid infection (regardless of whether you develop long Covid) are still unknown. So, between the 64 in several billion chance of (possibly) developing pancreatitis after vaccination, or the 1 in 100 chance of dying after catching Covid, it is clear that one option is many magnitudes of order safer than the other.