Posted on 03/27/2025 6:12:56 AM PDT by airdalechief
In yet another attack on President Donald Trump, some Democrats have targeted his immigration policies by calling for the deportation of his wife, Melania Trump. This outrageous and politically driven statement not only defies common sense but also reveals the left’s obsession with politicizing every aspect of Trump’s life, no matter how absurd. Although Melania Trump is a naturalized American citizen who followed the legal immigration process, left-wing critics are now exploiting her status to advance their anti-Trump, anti-immigrant agenda. These calls for her deportation serve no real purpose other than to further the left’s desperate attempts to undermine Trump’s presidency, a blatant effort to attack the president even if it means abandoning basic logic in the process.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
“We don't know whether or not her parents were documented. And maybe we better just take a look,” she continued.
(How in the hell did this no brain woman get to be a Representative?)
Mad Maxine’s new wig is too tight. She need to return it and get a bigger size.
Naturalized citizenship can be revoked.
Bring it, Maxine.
Does she ever realize how stupid she sounds, even after the fact?
She is the poster child for the Dunning-Krueger society.
CAN’T FIX STUPID
That old skank is just outrageously jealous because she is ugly af and melania is an ultra babe...
Maybe you won’t be ugly in your next life Maxie...
According to Maxine’s bio - “The fifth of 13 children, she was raised by her single mother after her father left the family when Maxine was two.”
So Maxine’s mother had eight more children after her husband left for the tax payer to support. Eight! Father’s Day must have been interesting.
This is all they have, can you imagine? This is what is important to the American voter?
This is just mean. What do you expect from a low IQ dimmocrap? She has nothing of value to say to Americans. Boy, her constituents must really be a low rent crowd, to repeatedly vote for this foul mouthed thug in a wig. What a waste of a salary.
Maxine is smart enough not to live in the congressional district she represents. I would suggest a motion in the House that she be deported from her mansion in another district to the district she officially “represents”.
well you CAN fix stupid...it’s just not legal.
Yes, How in the hell did this no brain woman get to be a Representative?
and yes, foul mouthed thug in a wig. What a waste of a salary.
Or else ... get her wig busted! 😁
congress.gov
The U.S. Constitution expressly grants each house of Congress the power to “punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.”
Expulsion is the process by which a house of Congress removes one of its Members after the Member has been duly elected and seated. The Supreme Court has considered expulsion to be distinct from exclusion, the process by which the House and Senate refuse to seat Members-elect. In so concluding, the Supreme Court has held that exclusion cannot be used as a disciplinary tool, and Congress, accordingly, cannot undertake disciplinary measures on Members until after those Members have taken the oath of office.
The constitutional limits on the power of expulsion are informed by the Expulsion Clause’s text, historical background, judicial precedent, and historical practice. Presently, the only explicit standards for expulsion are the supermajority voting requirement and that the individual subject to the expulsion has been formally seated as a Member of that body.
The history of the Expulsion Clause suggests that the expulsion power is broad and confers to each house of Congress significant discretion as to the proper grounds for which a Member may be expelled.
Accordingly, courts generally have declined to adjudicate the standards by which expulsions might be considered in the House or Senate. To date, 20 Members of Congress have been expelled: 5 in the House and 15 in the Senate.
A large majority of those expulsions were predicated on Members’ behavior deemed to be disloyal to the United States at the outset of the Civil War. Nonetheless, the two most recent expulsions followed Members’ convictions on public corruption charges.
One significant area of debate is whether a Member can be expelled for behavior arising prior to his or her election. The historical practice in each house of Congress is limited and mixed as to whether such expulsions are appropriate—with debates centered on two general concerns that may be in tension: maintaining the ability of each house of Congress to preserve the integrity of the institution and overriding the will and right of constituents to choose their representatives.
This report discusses the power of each house of Congress to remove a Member, including the historical background of the Clause, the implications of the limited judicial interpretations of the Clause’s meaning, and other potential constitutional limitations in the exercise of the expulsion power. The report then analyzes the potential grounds upon which a Member might be expelled, including an overview of past cases resulting in expulsion and a discussion of the potential exercise of the expulsion power for conduct occurring prior to the Member’s election or reelection to Congress.
snip
i love me some maxine
maxine/aoc ‘28
Mad Maxine needs to be deported. To anywhere but the US.
It can, but not at will and there are specific requirements for that, such as discovered fraud during the immigration process.
The gibsmedats keep electing her.
anything for air time
she must think she will go viral
with her outlandish , unbelievable
claim....playing to the lowest of the low.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.