Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maxine Waters Pushes for Melania Trump's Deportation Despite Her Legal U.S. Citizenship
https://townhall.com/ ^ | March 25, 2025 8:00 PM | Sarah Arnold

Posted on 03/27/2025 6:12:56 AM PDT by airdalechief

In yet another attack on President Donald Trump, some Democrats have targeted his immigration policies by calling for the deportation of his wife, Melania Trump. This outrageous and politically driven statement not only defies common sense but also reveals the left’s obsession with politicizing every aspect of Trump’s life, no matter how absurd. Although Melania Trump is a naturalized American citizen who followed the legal immigration process, left-wing critics are now exploiting her status to advance their anti-Trump, anti-immigrant agenda. These calls for her deportation serve no real purpose other than to further the left’s desperate attempts to undermine Trump’s presidency, a blatant effort to attack the president even if it means abandoning basic logic in the process.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: california; maxinewaters; saraharnold; townhall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
“When he [Trump] talks about birthright, and he's going to undo the fact that the Constitution allows those who are born here, even if the parents are undocumented, they have a right to stay in America. If he wants to start looking so closely to find those who were born here and their parents were undocumented, maybe he ought to first look at Mealnia,” the Democrat said.

“We don't know whether or not her parents were documented. And maybe we better just take a look,” she continued.

(How in the hell did this no brain woman get to be a Representative?)

1 posted on 03/27/2025 6:12:56 AM PDT by airdalechief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

Mad Maxine’s new wig is too tight. She need to return it and get a bigger size.


2 posted on 03/27/2025 6:14:32 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Bureaucratic District "Judges" are the greatest threat to America and Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

Naturalized citizenship can be revoked.
Bring it, Maxine.


3 posted on 03/27/2025 6:16:15 AM PDT by ComputerGuy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

Does she ever realize how stupid she sounds, even after the fact?
She is the poster child for the Dunning-Krueger society.


4 posted on 03/27/2025 6:17:51 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

CAN’T FIX STUPID


5 posted on 03/27/2025 6:19:03 AM PDT by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

6 posted on 03/27/2025 6:19:17 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

That old skank is just outrageously jealous because she is ugly af and melania is an ultra babe...

Maybe you won’t be ugly in your next life Maxie...


7 posted on 03/27/2025 6:20:02 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

According to Maxine’s bio - “The fifth of 13 children, she was raised by her single mother after her father left the family when Maxine was two.”

So Maxine’s mother had eight more children after her husband left for the tax payer to support. Eight! Father’s Day must have been interesting.


8 posted on 03/27/2025 6:23:03 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

This is all they have, can you imagine? This is what is important to the American voter?


9 posted on 03/27/2025 6:24:33 AM PDT by georgia peach (georgia peach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

This is just mean. What do you expect from a low IQ dimmocrap? She has nothing of value to say to Americans. Boy, her constituents must really be a low rent crowd, to repeatedly vote for this foul mouthed thug in a wig. What a waste of a salary.


10 posted on 03/27/2025 6:24:39 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Maxine is smart enough not to live in the congressional district she represents. I would suggest a motion in the House that she be deported from her mansion in another district to the district she officially “represents”.


11 posted on 03/27/2025 6:31:31 AM PDT by laconic ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Democrat = party of treason

well you CAN fix stupid...it’s just not legal.


12 posted on 03/27/2025 6:33:59 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief; EinNYC; All

Yes, How in the hell did this no brain woman get to be a Representative?

and yes, foul mouthed thug in a wig. What a waste of a salary.


13 posted on 03/27/2025 6:39:10 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Or else ... get her wig busted! 😁


14 posted on 03/27/2025 6:50:33 AM PDT by SMARTY (In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. Napoleon Bonaparte I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

congress.gov

The U.S. Constitution expressly grants each house of Congress the power to “punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.”

Expulsion is the process by which a house of Congress removes one of its Members after the Member has been duly elected and seated. The Supreme Court has considered expulsion to be distinct from exclusion, the process by which the House and Senate refuse to seat Members-elect. In so concluding, the Supreme Court has held that exclusion cannot be used as a disciplinary tool, and Congress, accordingly, cannot undertake disciplinary measures on Members until after those Members have taken the oath of office.

The constitutional limits on the power of expulsion are informed by the Expulsion Clause’s text, historical background, judicial precedent, and historical practice. Presently, the only explicit standards for expulsion are the supermajority voting requirement and that the individual subject to the expulsion has been formally seated as a Member of that body.

The history of the Expulsion Clause suggests that the expulsion power is broad and confers to each house of Congress significant discretion as to the proper grounds for which a Member may be expelled.

Accordingly, courts generally have declined to adjudicate the standards by which expulsions might be considered in the House or Senate. To date, 20 Members of Congress have been expelled: 5 in the House and 15 in the Senate.

A large majority of those expulsions were predicated on Members’ behavior deemed to be disloyal to the United States at the outset of the Civil War. Nonetheless, the two most recent expulsions followed Members’ convictions on public corruption charges.

One significant area of debate is whether a Member can be expelled for behavior arising prior to his or her election. The historical practice in each house of Congress is limited and mixed as to whether such expulsions are appropriate—with debates centered on two general concerns that may be in tension: maintaining the ability of each house of Congress to preserve the integrity of the institution and overriding the will and right of constituents to choose their representatives.

This report discusses the power of each house of Congress to remove a Member, including the historical background of the Clause, the implications of the limited judicial interpretations of the Clause’s meaning, and other potential constitutional limitations in the exercise of the expulsion power. The report then analyzes the potential grounds upon which a Member might be expelled, including an overview of past cases resulting in expulsion and a discussion of the potential exercise of the expulsion power for conduct occurring prior to the Member’s election or reelection to Congress.

snip


15 posted on 03/27/2025 6:51:07 AM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray...."Our Father, who art in heaven......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

i love me some maxine

maxine/aoc ‘28


16 posted on 03/27/2025 6:52:52 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

Mad Maxine needs to be deported. To anywhere but the US.


17 posted on 03/27/2025 6:53:14 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

It can, but not at will and there are specific requirements for that, such as discovered fraud during the immigration process.


18 posted on 03/27/2025 6:53:15 AM PDT by JadeEmperor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

The gibsmedats keep electing her.


19 posted on 03/27/2025 6:53:45 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: airdalechief

anything for air time

she must think she will go viral

with her outlandish , unbelievable

claim....playing to the lowest of the low.


20 posted on 03/27/2025 6:59:57 AM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (DONT DRINK & DRONE 🤓 HAVE A NICE DAY 😀 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson