Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the Greenpeace Dakota Access Pipeline Fine Means For the Future of Activism (only 5.83 years left)
Time ^ | 3/21/25 | Simmone Shah

Posted on 03/23/2025 5:10:20 AM PDT by Libloather

The environmental organization Greenpeace was ordered to pay more than $660 million dollars to the Texas-based pipeline company Energy Transfer this week over its role in the Dakota Access Pipeline protests nearly a decade ago.

The outcome was a blow to the environmental advocacy group, which has previously said that a lawsuit of this size could bankrupt its U.S. operations.

Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, accused Greenpeace USA and International of playing a central role in organizing the resistance to the pipeline at Standing Rock in 2016 and 2017. The protests drew national attention as activists set up camp on land owned by Energy Transfer in an attempt to delay the project’s construction. Law enforcement responded by deploying water cannons, tear gas, and other weapons on unarmed protesters—injuring hundreds. Greenpeace denied the company’s claims, and has said the case is “one of the largest Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) cases ever filed.”

“Greenpeace played an extremely limited role at Standing Rock, and is proud of showing up in solidarity with Standing Rock activists,” Deepa Padmanabha, senior legal advisor for Greenpeace, said in a statement in February. The protests brought together thousands of activists from around the country who opposed the development of part of the Dakota Access Pipeline on the Standing Rock reservation. “At no time did Greenpeace engage in property destruction or violence. All claims to the contrary are a reckless disregard for the truth.”

Experts say that the success of the so-called SLAPP lawsuit—and heavy penalty Greenpeace was dealt—stands to silence other activists who speak up against big companies. “This verdict, especially given its scope, really changes the calculus for advocacy groups who are engaged in, not just environmental issues, but more generally, in advocacy,” says Jennifer Safstrom, director of the Stanton Foundation...

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Outdoors; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: activism; agentsprovocateurs; climatechange; crime; dakotaaccess; domesticenemies; energytransfer; evil; fafo; greenpeace; jennifersafstrom; karma; lawsuit; pipeline; simmoneshah; standingrock; stantonfoundation; thestantonfoundation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Libloather

Add tasers to the mix and it’s win win.😁


21 posted on 03/23/2025 1:52:48 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I know someone from Minneapolis who was paid and bussed up to the protest along with many more.
I hope Greenpeace collapses under the fine for lying to Americans to promote their agenda.


22 posted on 03/23/2025 7:31:04 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson