No, I’m just laughing at the circular reasoning on this thread - people who believe the image of the crucifixion on the Shroud is a photographic negative. And that somehow proves the artifact must be legit - because it captures a historical event from a time when photography did not yet exist! LOL.
Make up your mind priest; is it science or is it a miracle?
You stupid troll.
It was science which discovered that it was a photographic negative.
And, since the technology did not exist back then even for that — let alone the induction of the Maillard reaction, let alone the intensity of the image corresponding to depth — that is further evidence against its being a forgery.
BTW, I noticed you’ve now retreated from your “random smears” argument.
Troll.