[quantim]

Why do the Brits so often put “risks WW3” on their headlines? This is BS, the conflict may be a worthless bloody and fatal draw in the end but a world war will not happen, it smells of clickbait and reduces the true nature of articles.

[Apparatchik]

Why do the Brits so often put “risks WW3” on their headlines?

For the same reason that every thread about the war here on FR included at least one hysterical post from a Pooper that screeched that US and other international aid to Ukraine’s efforts to defend itself would start WWIII.

Funny that you’re just noticing that now.

[odawg]

“Why do the Brits so often put “risks WW3” on their headlines?”

British newspaper headline, I suppose. However, when the Brits aid the Ukrainians with long range missile strikes into Russia, it is not.

[bert]

WW III is necessary to get America to help them get rid of the internal struggle against Pakistan