1 posted on
01/30/2025 10:56:22 AM PST by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; JosephW; martin_fierro; Still Thinking; zeugma; Vinnie; ironman; Egon; raybbr; AFreeBird; ...
Thanks to Red Badger for the ping!
2 posted on
01/30/2025 10:56:47 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
To: ShadowAce
“a high-power laser interacting with a small cuvette filled with ethanol”
FINALLY! Something useful for all the ethanol that government pays farmers to grow.
3 posted on
01/30/2025 10:57:49 AM PST by
ProtectOurFreedom
(They were the FA-est of times, they were the FO-est of times.)
To: ShadowAce
As long as their end users are human, security systems remain breakable.
4 posted on
01/30/2025 11:27:32 AM PST by
Jyotishi
(Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
To: ShadowAce
>
...encrypts information as a hologram that is scrambled when sent through a small container of liquid and then uses a neural network for decryption... And I'm supposed to feel totally 100% bullet-proof confident that I'll be able to decrypt my data after that?
There are times when I want to just write it down on notepaper and hide it under the mattress. Might not be uber-uber-encrypted, but at least I know I can get it and read it later.
6 posted on
01/30/2025 3:04:54 PM PST by
dayglored
(This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
To: ShadowAce
I’’’ll be interested in seeing what Bruce Schneier from Counterpane thinks of this.
He is good at cutting through the bull that often wraps articles about cryptographyyy
From the description, implementation details would be pretty critical
Full details of the algorithms would be absolutely required
7 posted on
02/02/2025 7:17:34 PM PST by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson