It sure caused the Nvidia stock price to drop.
Even Microsoft said AI will never be secure so Deepseek is spyware , even sounds like spyware ,LOL
Hmmm. DeepSeek coder. Inserts backdoors every other line of code.
Have the Chinese done something that would make them untrustworthy?
Wow, it racked up some fantastic numbers in Codeforces, AIME 2024, MMLU, GPQA Diamond, WE-bench Verified, and AlpacaEval 2.0! Wouldn’t you agree?
But what about KittyKat 3.4 and LlamaPet 12.6? Why were those omitted?
“Some people have “ “possible ties”??? Who, the ones with an IQ greater than the average of any still in the Democratic party?
Any company operating in China is directly controlled by the CCP. Geesh. It has been that way for ages. That is the basis of communism — despite the contrary lies of DBags like Cuban who like buying Chinese trash.
More likely an American psyop.
We give it to them to introduce, conveniently, the week the Trump admin wants to introduce a new, AI, “Manhattan project”. As if the Ellison/Altman announcement weren’t bad enough.
That's wrong. IIRC, DeepSeek claimed it developed and trained R1 in 2 months, not 2 years (55 days to be exact).
This looks like a Chinese psyop alright.
The R1 model was trained using multi-stage training and large-scale reinforcement learning techniques.
= = =
Is that Chinese training by torture methods.
Ask DeepSeek to list any of Xi’s failures.
Seems to me this article minimizes the fact that DeepSeek has made RI an Open Source project. What this means is that they have made the source code that drives this system available to anyone who wants to use it. The idea of a trap door in “every other line of code” if kinda hard when you can view every line of code.
Is the source code the same as that of the RI system? I don’t know, but if that code is available, just compile it and see how it compares to the “real” system.
Anyone who uses deepseek and rednote are as good as spies for the Chinese.
I don’t know a thing about this stuff but I still smell a rat and panic over what seems unlikely.
Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang said during an interview with CNBC on Thursday [of last week], without providing evidence, that DeepSeek has 50,000 Nvidia H100 chips.The H800 chip, used by China and DeepSeek to train the R1 AI platform, is a downgraded version of the H100 with about half the interconnect bandwidth. While it retains strong AI processing power, its reduced performance makes it less suitable for cutting-edge, large-scale AI workloads.
But China wouldn't cheat, steal, or lie would it?
He also runs a hedge fund, which could potentially be funding DeepSeek’s operations.
—
Just adds money to the pool from the CCP which controls every single business in China - all businesses are required to have at least one Party member to manage to company. This is all part of the Civilian-Military Fusion policy begun by Xi Jinping.
There is no such thing as a government-independent company in China. The CCP runs everything.
registering for use of Deepseek requires you to give then your email address and likely goes downhill from there.
Deep Six.
Psyop and propaganda.
And short sell vehicle.
I’m surprised at how quickly this new AI has gained broad acceptance. I personally don’t think that it is feasible to develop such a thing at this low a cost. They don’t get paid as well as American engineers for one thing. Also they are not above lying.
Thought something similar when I first heard about this yesterday.
It’s a classic tactic in technology wars, to “freeze” product-adoption decisions by potential users. It occurs when a new technology is released, and is getting a big buzz and a lot of investment, AND when the slower market-player is way behind the curve with their own offering. The A.I. marketplace is exactly in this state today.
If successful, China hopes they can cause potential A.I. users to defer purchase decisions and their own development and integration investments, waiting for the (now) expected release of China’s product.
Common components when using this tactic are to announce that your own product is as good as, if not better than the current market leader, that it will be available very soon, and that it will come at a much lower cost.
To me, this whole charade is China effectively announcing that they agree A.I. is going to be huge, that they’re going to be a player, and that they’re behind in the A.I. “arms race”.