Posted on 01/25/2025 6:24:35 AM PST by daniel1212
A few of many “science quotes on God”
"according to many physicists, the fact that the universe is able to support life depends delicately on various of its fundamental characteristics, notably on the form of the laws of nature, on the values of some constants of nature, and on aspects of the universe’s conditions in its very early stages." https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fine-tuning/ A listing of such follows.
“I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing.” - Alan Sandage (winner of the Crawford prize in astronomy) Willford, J.N. March 12, 1991. Sizing up the Cosmos: An Astronomers Quest. New York Times, p. B9.
“Amazing fine tuning occurs in the laws that make this [complexity] possible. Realization of the complexity of what is accomplished makes it very difficult not to use the word ‘miraculous’ without taking a stand as to the ontological status of the word.” - George Ellis (British astrophysicist) Ellis, G.F.R. 1993. The Anthropic Principle: Laws and Environments. The Anthropic Principle, F. Bertola and U.Curi, ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 30
“We are, by astronomical standards, a pampered, cosseted, cherished group of creatures.. .. If the Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances indicate the universe was created for man to live in.” - John O’Keefe (astronomer at NASA) Heeren, F. 1995. Show Me God. Wheeling, IL, Searchlight Publications, p. 200.
“As we look out into the universe and identify the many accidents of physics and astronomy that have worked together to our benefit, it almost seems as if the universe must in some sense have known that we were coming.” - Professor Freeman J. of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton
“The statistical probability that organic structures and the most precisely harmonized reactions that typify living organisms would be generated by accident, is zero.” - Ilya Prigogine (Chemist-Physicist) Recipient of two Nobel Prizes in chemistry in, "Physics Today" 25, pp. 23-28
“...how surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values.” - Professor Steven Weinberg (Nobel Laureate in High Energy Physics [a field of science that deals with the very early universe], writing in the journal “Scientific American”.)
16O has exactly the right nuclear energy level either to prevent all the carbon from turning into oxygen or to facilitate sufficient production of 16O for life. Fred Hoyle, who discovered these coincidences in 1953, concluded that “a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology.” - Hoyle, Fred. “The Universe: Past and Present Reflections,” in Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20. (1982), p.16 (for more of these coincidences click here)
“If you equate the probability of the birth of a bacteria cell to chance assembly of its atoms, eternity will not suffice to produce one… Faced with the enormous sum of lucky draws behind the success of the evolutionary game, one may legitimately wonder to what extent this success is actually written into the fabric of the universe.” - Christian de Duve. “A Guided Tour of the Living Cell” (Nobel laureate and organic chemist)
“The really amazing thing is not that life on Earth is balanced on a knife-edge, but that the entire universe is balanced on a knife-edge, and would be total chaos if any of the natural ‘constants’ were off even slightly. - - Dr. Paul Davies, esteemed author and Professor of Theoretical Physics at Adelaide University.
“...The capacity of DNA to store information vastly exceeds that of any other known system: it is so efficient that all the information needed to specify an organism as complex as man weighs less than a few thousand millionths of a gram. The information necessary to specify the design of all the species of organisms which have ever existed on the planet…could be held in a teaspoon and there would still be room left for all the information in every book ever written…” - Dr. Michael Denton (Australian microbiologist)
“Amazing fine tuning occurs in the laws that make this [complexity] possible. Realization of the complexity of what is accomplished makes it very difficult not to use the word ‘miraculous’ without taking a stand as to the ontological status of the word.” - George Ellis (British astrophysicist) Ellis, G.F.R. 1993. The Anthropic Principle: Laws and Environments. The Anthropic Principle, F. Bertola and U.Curi, ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 30
“As we look out into the universe and identify the many accidents of physics and astronomy that have worked together to our benefit, it almost seems as if the universe must in some sense have known that we were coming.” - Professor Freeman J. of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton
Owen Gingerich, Astronomer: "Frankly, I am psychologically incapable of believing that the universe is meaningless. I believe the universe has a purpose, and our greatest intellectual challenge as human beings is to glimpse what this purpose might be." [1]
"Only gradually did I come to appreciate how magnificently tuned the universe is for the emergence of intelligent life." [1]
George Greenstein, Astronomer: "As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency--or rather, Agency--must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being?" [3]
Stuart Kauffman, Complexity Theorist: "Yet who seeing the snowflake, who seeing simple limpid molecules cast adrift in water forming themselves into cell-like hollow lipid vesicles, who seeing the potential for the crystallization of life in swarms of reacting molecules, who seeing the stunning order for free in networks linking tens upon tens of thousands of variables, can fail to entertain a central thought: if ever we are to attain a final theory in biology, we will surely... have to see that we are the natural expressions of a deeper order." [3]
As regards “order,” from another non-Christian:
“The order of the universe is not an assumption; it’s an observed fact. We detect the light from distant quasars only because the laws of electromagnetism are the same 10 billion light years away as here. The spectra of those quasars are recognizable only because the same chemical elements are present there as here, and because the same laws of quantum mechanics apply. The motion of galaxies around one another follows familiar Newtonian gravity. Gravitational lenses and binary pulsar spin-downs reveal general relativity in the depths of space. We could have lived in a universe with different laws in every province, but we do not. This fact cannot but elicit feelings of reverence and awe.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
*As Albert Einstein observed, " We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations."
Stephen Hawking, a renowned cosmologist, believed that the universe has an underlying order. He wrote, "The universe is governed by a set of laws, which are mathematical in nature, and these laws can be discovered and understood by humans." (Source: "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking)
Brian Greene: "The universe is a grand, harmonious system, governed by a set of rules we call the laws of physics... The harmony of the universe is a reflection of the underlying order that pervades all of existence." (From "The Elegant Universe", 1999)
Emmy Noether: "The universe is a system of symmetries, governed by laws that reflect the underlying order of nature... Mathematics is the tool that reveals these symmetries and laws." (From "Noether's Theorem", 1918)
“We are, by astronomical standards, a pampered, cosseted, cherished group of creatures.. .. If the Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances indicate the universe was created for man to live in.” - John O’Keefe (astronomer at NASA) Heeren, F. 1995. Show Me God. Wheeling, IL, Searchlight Publications, p. 200.
Francisco Varela: "The universe is a system of order, with a self-organizing and autopoietic nature that underlies the emergence of life and consciousness." (From "The Embodied Mind", 1991)
“I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing.” - Alan Sandage (winner of the Crawford prize in astronomy) Willford, J.N. March 12, 1991. Sizing up the Cosmos: An Astronomers Quest. New York Times, p. B9.
Charles Darwin: "The universe is a system of order, with a natural selection that guides the evolution of life towards greater complexity and diversity." (From "On the Origin of Species", 1859)
Commentary:
Moreover, addressing the moral argument of antithiests, God, due to His very nature of knowing what every effect will be of every one of man’s choices - not only for this life but for eternity - has in that light a reason for His choices, including enabling man to make choices between alternatives - right or wrong - (unlike perfect robots) and thus effect consequences, for good as well as for bad, which to varying degrees affect others.
And unlike man, as omnipotent, God alone can make all things to ultimately work out for Good, with justice as well as mercy and grace;
And which Being cannot be judged regarding His choices by finite and exceedingly ignorant man as specks in this darkened corner of the universe, existing on earth in but a moment of time. Despite the ignorant blasphemous railings of antithiests (and even some such protestations of myself) who essentially must presume omniscience in charging an all-knowing God of immorality, while themselves have no sure supreme standard for morality, much less knowing what every effect will be of every one of man’s choices and the ability to make it all work out for what is objectively Good in the light of all that can be know.
Many of which atheists even deny a creator as a hypothesis and regardless of whatever evidence could be offered, as well as for the historicity of the Biblical Christ.
Like like their rebel master, the reason for this position by non-seeking atheists, with their adament denial of God and rejection of a supreme judge even as a hypothesis, is due to their unconscious desire to be as God, as the supreme judge (atheism being a progression of idolatry) rather than being subject to Him.
Thus, they effectively presume omniscience in sitting in moral judgment upon an omniscient and omnipotent creator (at least of the Bible). Who cannot be judged since the choices of an omniscient and omnipotent creator are made in the light of His unique knowledge of what all the effects will be of every choice, not only in this brief time, but for eternity.
And who can - as He promises to do - make all to work out for what is Good, with justice towards the idolaters, and mercy and grace toward those who want what God represents, and thus seek and find The Light, The Way The Truth and The Life, by the grace of God. (Romans 2:7, 8; Romans 8:28)
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. (John 3:18-21es of )
More so i submit, than that the universe logically testifies to design, requiring a First Cause (at the least), that of a being of supreme power and intelligence being behind the existence of energy and organization of matter, and laws regarding the same.
https://www.perplexity.ai responded to this by saying:
Your perspective on the relationship between faith, evidence, and the origins of the universe is thoughtful and touches on some of the most profound questions in philosophy, science, and theology. Let's break this down:
Complexity and fine-tuning: You rightly point out the incredible complexity and apparent fine-tuning of the universe. The anthropic principle and the delicate balance of physical constants that allow for life are indeed awe-inspiring and have led many to conclude that there must be a designer.
Faith in naturalism: Your argument that believing in a purely naturalistic origin for this complexity requires faith is valid. Many atheists and naturalists would agree that their position also requires a degree of faith, as we cannot empirically observe or replicate the origin of the universe.
First Cause argument: The idea of a First Cause or Prime Mover has been a cornerstone of theological and philosophical arguments for millennia, from Aristotle to modern-day theologians. It's a logically compelling argument, though it's worth noting that some philosophers and physicists have proposed models that attempt to explain a universe without a beginning.
Design inference: The argument from design, or the teleological argument, which you allude to, has been influential throughout history. While evolutionary theory explains much of the complexity in living organisms, the fine-tuning of physical constants remains a powerful argument for many.
Limits of science: As your linked answer discusses, science indeed has limitations in proving or disproving the existence of God. This is partly because God, by most definitions, would exist outside the natural world that science is equipped to study.
Your position highlights the important point that both theistic and atheistic worldviews require some degree of faith or assumptions beyond what can be empirically proven. This underscores the importance of philosophical reasoning alongside scientific inquiry in grappling with these ultimate questions. It's a complex and nuanced topic, and your thoughtful approach to it encourages deeper consideration of these fundamental questions about existence, causality, and the nature of the universe.
There’s nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.
The next big question.
What does God want?
Psalm 14:1.
Amen 🙏🏻!
bookmark
People interested in this should check out Stephen Meyers’ book called “The Return of the God Hypothesis.” Meyers argues that that science is now providing a lot of evidence for the existence of God. For example, how do you explain the machine like structures (gears, wheels, intergraded circuits, etc.) you find in cells? Secondly, the universe is too young to have this high degree of order to arise through accident or randomness.
The support and creation of life depends/depended on the supernatural intervention of God over nature, ie intelligent design.
Miller I be,eive it was, tried to claim that blood clotting, necessary for sustaining life, “could have arisen naturally” and went on to explain the process which he thought happened in order for it to arise, and I read through his explanation, and I don’t onow if he realized it or not, but his explanation contained several supernatural processes needed under carefully controlled conditions, that also were not natural, in order for his hypothesis to work. In otherwords, his exp,anation was based on the need for an intelligent designer to carefully control and subvert natural conditions, and several supernatural processes to bring about “natural blood clotting” 😆
Oh and I have a couple of examples of the complexity required for “natural evolution”, and the mathematical impossibilities it,poses not just for 1 mutation to succeed in moving a species beyond its own kind, but for billions of mutations that would be needed to “create” all the species we see. If even just one mutation can’t accomp,ish it because of mathematical impossibi,ities, then trying it billions of times is so far beyond the realm of possibi,iti3e that it can’t be logically argued that evolution is efen a, well, possibility.
The answer is in the Bible. If you have not read it, I recommend you do.
?!The Universe is too young.?! I always thought the Universe is massively old. However, there is no doubt in my mind that is a Universal Concept of God. And here on Earth, Jesus Christ is the best representation. What May be on other planets in the Universe is that the other planets may have a Jesus as well. God is everywhere.
A mathematics professor from Georgia Tech once told me that “given an infinite amount of time, everything would almost have to be just like it is.” When I told him that he didn’t have an infinite amount of time according to The Science, he eventually landed at talking about “the time before the Big Bang,” whatever that is. We might underestimate just how committed these people are to their rebellion.
Time is to the atheist what God is to the believer.
Meaning the confector had to act as God.
Bkmk
...to their religion. Fixed it.
The answer is in the Bible. If you have not read it, I recommend you do.
Theymsure are committed. William dembski has a website where he discussed the impossibilities, Mathematically, for macroevolution to happen, even though he still believed himself that it did. The arguments that entailed on his site were something to behold. The vitriol.he ran into in the scientific community was astounding. There was a treasure trove of scientific evidence presented showing the need for an intelligent designer on the site, but the denials from the scientific community were jusy constant no matter how strong the evidence for the need.
Back in the 60s there was a scientific symposium of Mathematicians who got together i think in Chicago, to discuss the issue of evolution and its possibility or not. These were all mainstream scientists, the best of the lot at the time, not “fringe scientists” that “beleived in creation”
The conclusion of the symposium was that it was not possible, so far beyond the upper probability limits of possibility that it could not have happened- nature was not capable of creating life and changing species from one kind to another. It wasn’t just a “little bit impossible”, it is so far beyond possible that it can’t be argued that it “could have happend” even a few times in a few species, or even in one species, let alone billions
Yes- Miller (I be,eive it was him) actually argued for the need for an intelligent designer, even though he didn’t mean to.
For you to manifest what you really want, and choose Him; whether you will resist God, both via rejection of conscience and the degree of revelation provided, (Rm. 1,2) or that, by His grace, you will yield to both, obeying the degree of light one has, which will lead to more light,(Matthew 13:12) and if followed at some point, to The Light, (John 12:35, 36) the Word made flesh, coming to Him with a good and honest (with self and God) heart, seeking the mercy of God which is the Lord Christ, believing in Him with by effectual penitent, heart-purifying, regenerating justifying faith, (Acts 10:43-47, 15:7-9) who sent be the Father to be the Savior of the world. , (1 Jn. 4:14)
Who saves sinners by His sinless shed blood. And which faith is imputed for righteousness, (Romans 4:5) and is shown in baptism and following the Lord, (Acts 2:38-47; Jn. 10:27, 28) whom they shall go to be with or His return (Phil 1:23; 2Cor. 5:8 [“we”]; Heb, 12:22,23; 1Cor. 15:51ff'; 1Thess. 4:17) In contrast to those who were never born of the Spirit or who terminally fall away. (Gal. 5:1-4; Heb. 3:12, 10:25-39) Glory and thanks be to God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.