Maybe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
2 posted on
01/13/2025 2:41:09 AM PST by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: Libloather
We will know for certain that the fires have caused enough damage when the authorities begin to blame the white Jake from State Farm for his lack of response.
4 posted on
01/13/2025 2:51:20 AM PST by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: Libloather
A Shocking Analysis has yielded a Haunting New Theory.
6 posted on
01/13/2025 3:09:56 AM PST by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: Libloather
Maybe fires need to be replaced with “Firing Squads”!!
To: Libloather
9 posted on
01/13/2025 3:16:09 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Libloather
10 posted on
01/13/2025 3:19:25 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Libloather
Yeah, they find the dude with a flame thrower, 5 phones and a UN-funded card in the act (and he wasn’t the only one)—and now it was supposed to be embers from a fire put out 7 days earlier?
And how about the other fires?
To: Libloather
I’m bettting on the drug addled illegal alien drifter with the lit blow torch, but that’s just silly me.
To: Libloather
We're saved....Zelensky is offering to send 150 fireman....lol
What a da.
To: Libloather
And the issue really isn’t that the fire(s) exist. The issue is that the city, county, and state weren’t prepared to handle ANY fire, really. That’s in spite of the fact that there are wild fires EVERY year there.
18 posted on
01/13/2025 4:14:39 AM PST by
MayflowerMadam
(It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
To: Libloather
Maybe that New Years Eve fire was not kicked off by fireworks but by a professional arsonist/terrorist who had carefully selected that site as one strategically located to to start a New Years Eve wild fire to do the most serious end widespread damage to the Pacific Palisades and Malibu areas.
Unfortunately the conditions were not right for a major wild fire on New Years Eve and the LAFD was able to get on site early enough to put the fire out before it had a chance to spread.
So the arsonist came back to re start the fire in the same carefully selected site when the forecasts of record high winds made conditions ideal.
20 posted on
01/13/2025 4:17:00 AM PST by
rdcbn1
(TV )
To: Libloather
This is progress. Kooks were blaming the fires in HI on Directed Energy Weapons.
22 posted on
01/13/2025 4:23:43 AM PST by
Fury
To: Libloather
27 posted on
01/13/2025 5:11:58 AM PST by
C210N
(Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.)
To: Libloather
Who,gives a s#$+! There was no water in the reservoir and the hydrants were dry.
28 posted on
01/13/2025 5:16:29 AM PST by
Chgogal
(Voting Democrat is suicidal. )
To: Libloather
30 posted on
01/13/2025 5:31:46 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Libloather
32 posted on
01/13/2025 5:33:23 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Libloather
Deflecting from purpose set, ala Maui.
34 posted on
01/13/2025 5:41:58 AM PST by
CodeToad
(Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
To: Libloather
35 posted on
01/13/2025 5:45:25 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Libloather
If the Pacific Palisades fire started January 1, it could impact property tax assessments if they get made based on that date.
To: Libloather
Even if the fire started on January 8th, house sales made on the first of January or December 31 would not have settled, so the market value on January 1st would be less than lot value.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson