Posted on 01/12/2025 6:34:32 PM PST by simpson96
Correct.
Right. And android has them too.
My son manages a tire store in town. A few months back, a police officer arrived in his cruiser with a woman in her car. She thought she was being tracked. They put the car on the lift to examine it and found an AirTag encased in sprayable foam insulation on the underside of the car!
The woman was right. I don’t know how she suspected somebody was tracking her, but that was sure a rotten, sneaky thing to do slapping that tag on her car. The perp clearly knew how to do it to weather-protect the tag and came prepared with the right materials.
This dude may have a defense... After all... Isn’t ON-Star tracking millions of cars? Why can they do it while nobody else can?
Wrong. Android phones can show unauthorized AirTags.
How does it do that? Does it send an alert to your phone too?
Bluetooth is Bluetooth.
Things are pretty dam bad when private citizens are able be as criminal as the government !
I think Android can also detect them, not sure though.
Needed to wrap the car in a Faraday bag..
Yes
This sounds like a missed opportunity to feed someone the wrong information.
I don’t have ‘onstar’ but isn’t onstar by subscription and consent??
Every AirTag has a unique serial number, and paired AirTags are associated with an Apple ID. Apple can provide the paired account details in response to a subpoena or valid request from law enforcement. We have successfully partnered with them on cases where information we provided has been used to trace an AirTag back to the perpetrator, who was then apprehended and charged.So if you want to track someone, maybe go with some offbrand Chinese equipment rather than something that can be easily traced back to you.
We’re gonna have burner tags soon I imagine if not already.
These days, the catch-all word is "telematics". Lots of newer vehicles have this capability (it may indeed by mandated by fedgov by now).
Consent? Not according to lawsuits.
https://www.carscoops.com/2024/05/gms-onstar-accused-of-spying-on-drivers-selling-data-to-insurers/
https://gmauthority.com/blog/2024/05/gm-ditches-onstar-smart-driver-feature/
From the article: "However, a furor erupted when GM vehicle owners noticed their insurance premiums were hiked by their insurers after they enrolled in Smart Driver. It soon emerged that The General was sharing detailed, personally identifiable driving data with information brokers such as LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Verisk, which then sold the info to insurance companies. Consent to the practice was hazy at best, with the possibility of having one’s data shared alleged to be buried in fine print. Some drivers reported that the OnStar Smart Driver feature reported their information even after they declined to be enrolled in it, whether because they felt it was unnecessary or because they had privacy concerns."
I know someone whose '60s classic car was stolen a few weeks ago. It was recovered by use of tracking tags - the owner hid both an Apple AirTag and some no-name Android compatible tracker. The thieves found the AirTag and removed it, but the other tag succeeded.
My daughter’s psycho-ex boyfriend did this to her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.