Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer?
Biola university ^ | May 31, 2010 | Biola Magazine Staff

Posted on 01/12/2025 6:50:59 AM PST by daniel1212

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Excerpt of larger article . I plan to post more of these, though as with the testimony threads I began to post, I do not plan to respond much (time and energy).
1 posted on 01/12/2025 6:50:59 AM PST by daniel1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

‘Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer?’

Yes.


2 posted on 01/12/2025 6:51:45 AM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer?

This question is too modest. The conclusion has been self evident long before the discovery of DNA.

3 posted on 01/12/2025 7:10:58 AM PST by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
...(time and energy).

And that is the truth. So often here, in our increasingly declining IQ culture, "not responding" when one is the OP is characterized as "running and hiding".

4 posted on 01/12/2025 7:15:25 AM PST by 4Runner (Watch. Wallet. Gun. Right foot! Left foot! Sweet Liberty Valens!Thank God for Guns! --Denny Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

The answer to this question, to me, has always been an absolute yes.

If there is programming behind biology, then there’s the possibility of programming behind every system in the universe. Obviously the universe’s (macro) programming is beyond our comprehension, the same way we didn’t know about DNA, or understand it, until relatively recently. It may even be beyond our ability to ever observe it. But, if we can find it in other, more “localized” systems, inductive reasoning would point to its existence everywhere.

And if there is programming behind every system in the universe, whether the universe is physical or virtual (doesn’t matter which, to be honest), then the universe is an open, sandbox simulation.


5 posted on 01/12/2025 7:32:39 AM PST by AnglePark (My opinion is the most worthless thing I own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

as a life-long computer scientist, systems designer and programmer, as well as a lifelong student of the molecular life sciences, it’s crystal clear that life on earth did NOT arise by flipping an atomic coin an astronomical gazillions of times ...

the intra-cellular nano-machinery and mechanisms are mind-blowingly similar to computing machinery, programmatic data, and principles of data coding, such as modular coding and reuse of code ... it’s simply undeniable that cellular functioning consists of an unimaginably intricate set of very clever machines constructed from organic molecule parts ... and anyone who pretends like that all happened by accident is either an ignorant fool or a liar or both ...

Some “scientists” claim to believe that lightning and cosmic rays struck a primordial soup in ammonia-rich oceans, producing the complex molecules that formed the precursors to life. Others believe that chemical reactions at deep-sea hydrothermal vents gave rise to cell membranes and simple cellular pumps.

In other words, the massively sophisticated molecular machinery of single-cell organisms simply arose spontaneously as fully functional units after bombarding mud puddles with lightening and cosmic rays for a few hundred million years.

And, btw, the current THEORY of evolution is no different than the previous “discredited” 19th century “spontaneous generation” theory that life arose spontaneously from mud puddles. The ONLY difference is the amounts of time involved in the two theories ... plus some extra mumbo-jumbo about lightening, cosmic rays and sea water ...

If you believe that, then you should have no problem at all with believing that a Panasonic CF-54 laptop computer with Windows 7 operating system could arise spontaneously if we simply ground such a bunch of laptop into powder along with a bunch of powered DVD of the Windows Operating system and filled a bunch of beakers with those powders, put some sea water in, and then bombarded the laptop soup in the beakers with lightening for a few billion years while shaking the beakers.

Eventually, we might obtain some resisters and capacitors, but then they would evolve into integrated circuit chips, which would eventually EVOLVE all by themselves into laptops (with operating systems) after being bombarded by cosmic rays for a very long time after the first resisters and capacitors appeared.

If organic life formed by accident in a similar scenario, then certainly there should be no problem with obtaining the laptop and operating system in a like fashion, because after all, the laptop and OS are a few thousand trillion times simpler than, say, a single cell of the Homo Sapiens species. In fact, we should obtain the laptop and OS much much faster because they are so much simpler.


6 posted on 01/12/2025 7:36:41 AM PST by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I believe DNA does show an intelligent design. I believe there is FAR more evidence in the universe of intelligent design. One of the factors is how well the laws of the universe respond to mathematics.


7 posted on 01/12/2025 7:37:32 AM PST by carcraft (Pray for our Country )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnglePark
If there is programming behind biology, then there’s the possibility of programming behind every system in the universe.

That pretty much sums it up. Brilliant observation!

8 posted on 01/12/2025 7:46:41 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

catnipman, many thanks for your post. Most interesting. :-)


9 posted on 01/12/2025 7:54:48 AM PST by jigsaw (May God Bless America's Service Members.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
This question is too modest. The conclusion has been self evident long before the discovery of DNA.

Yes, but some people do not even believe the moon landings were real.

10 posted on 01/12/2025 7:56:55 AM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carcraft

Yep. Romans 1:20


11 posted on 01/12/2025 7:57:11 AM PST by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnglePark
If there is programming behind biology, then there’s the possibility of programming behind every system in the universe. Obviously the universe’s (macro) programming is beyond our comprehension, the same way we didn’t know about DNA, or understand it, until relatively recently. It may even be beyond our ability to ever observe it. But, if we can find it in other, more “localized” systems, inductive reasoning would point to its existence everywhere. And if there is programming behind every system in the universe, whether the universe is physical or virtual (doesn’t matter which, to be honest), then the universe is an open, sandbox simulation.

That the universe is ID should be beyond dispute, but whether the Democrat platform is should find dispute.

12 posted on 01/12/2025 8:00:18 AM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
the intra-cellular nano-machinery and mechanisms are mind-blowingly similar to computing machinery, programmatic data, and principles of data coding, such as modular coding and reuse of code ... it’s simply undeniable that cellular functioning consists of an unimaginably intricate set of very clever machines constructed from organic molecule parts ... and anyone who pretends like that all happened by accident is either an ignorant fool or a liar or both ...

The thief claimed that he just could not the police station.

13 posted on 01/12/2025 8:01:43 AM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Read later.


14 posted on 01/12/2025 8:07:56 AM PST by NetAddicted (MAGA2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

“Can DNA Prove the Existence of an Intelligent Designer?”

Only if you understand the epigenetic effect of consciousness upon the physical body manifestation and the specialization of stem cells.


15 posted on 01/12/2025 8:19:48 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Right on.

Romans 1:19
“...since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.”

Regardless of age-of-the-universe and religious views, the basic distinction between Intelligent Design and Naturalism is this:

An intelligence behind the miracle, or no intelligence behind the miracle.

Naturalism presents a “just so” view, where everything is seemingly internally coherent post-miracle. The claim is essentially “Just give us this one miracle and the rest will make sense.”

They simultaneously argue for a non-intelligent, self-existent matter being acted upon by self-existent laws to produce the miracle of the universe and all therein, while mocking the idea of an intelligent, self-existent being to do the same.

Romans 1:23
“Claiming to be wise, they became fools...”


16 posted on 01/12/2025 8:20:46 AM PST by Señor Presidente (Tyranny deserves insurrection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AnglePark

Excellent comment.


17 posted on 01/12/2025 8:20:47 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
The Revelation at Sinai proves everything.

Only thing is that it's pre-chrstian and doesn't prove chrstianity, so everyone ignores it for philosophical speculation.

18 posted on 01/12/2025 8:21:40 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (בראשית ברא אלקים את השמים ואת הארץ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

Oh, please. There is too little info.

Interesting SF article years ago. Premise was the value of pi. Math dingbat (I went to school with some, they are crazier than electrical engineers) runs big computer out to millions and millions of digits. Then, a message appears. Message is along the lines of: “Took you long enough to get here. How do you like what I did?”


19 posted on 01/12/2025 8:28:49 AM PST by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
That the universe is ID should be beyond dispute, but whether the Democrat platform is should find dispute.

Intelligence is only one ingredient. Benevolence vs. Malevolence is another. (As well as the existence of committees.)

20 posted on 01/12/2025 10:11:46 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson