[daniel1212]

Because the AI doesn’t actually “understand” your question at all. It’s a random word generator. You asked it a question that had the word “counselor” in it and it found a bunch of sentences in its database that had the word “counselor” and synonyms in them and spit them back out at you. It has zero data at all about what guidance counselors actually say, it just made crap up.

IF AI is to be faulted, when it actually answered the question, then how bad is the algorithm which would not, while Google AI provided links for each of its few AI results.

[discostu]

AI didn’t answer the question, AI made crap up. There’s nothing wrong with the algorithm at all. AI is a toy, not a researcher. One of my co-workers asked AI if there was a .Net API that would do a certain thing he was hoping for. AI said “yes, this it and the parameters”, problem the correct answer was no, no such API existed and when he tried to use it it failed to compile. AI is there to amuse you and make you happy. Sometimes it might actually spit out something useful, but it’s first objective is to give you something that looks like an answer, even if it’s all made up.